Systematic review and meta-aggregate analysis of mental health service users' perspectives on romantic and intimate relationships and their support needs
Smith O Connor, A.; Killaspy, H.; Eager, S.; Wu, E.; Lloyd-Evans, B.
Show abstract
We conducted a systematic review and meta-aggregate synthesis to collate qualitative evidence about mental health service users views on their needs for romantic and intimate relationships and support measures. Four databases were searched in April 2024 (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024503997). Eligible studies involved (i) adult participants with any mental health condition who had received/were receiving care from mental health services; and (ii) had qualitative data specific to romantic/intimate relationship needs and support implications. Quality appraisal was conducted using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data extraction and synthesis were conducted using meta-aggregation and the level of confidence in the synthesised findings was assessed using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We included 17 studies and extracted 100 specific findings. From these, 17 categories were created and grouped into four synthesised findings: (i) individuals with mental health conditions have a desire for romantic and intimate relationships; (ii) mental health conditions can directly hinder romantic and/or intimate relationships at the individual-level; (ii) psychosocial factors impact romantic and/or intimate relationships; and (iv) services are lacking and can act as obstacles for service users to engage in/discuss romance and/or intimacy. We found that service users had clear needs relating to romantic and intimate relationships, but experienced multiple challenges in meeting these needs. In general, mental health services tended to not provide support in this area. Implications for practice include: (i) recognising romantic and intimate relationship needs as part of routine mental health care; (ii) making sexual health and healthy relationship information available; (iii) offering spaces for group discussion and support; and (iv) facilitating social activities to meet others and build social skills and confidence.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 97%
- Sexual and Reproductive Health Needs of Women with Severe Mental Illness in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review 97%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 97%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 96%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- While they wait: A cross-sectional survey on wait times for mental health treatment for anxiety and depression for Australian adolescents 95%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 96%
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 95%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 96%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 95%
- Secondary Stressors And Their Psychosocial Impacts On Healthcare Staff: Lessons From A Qualitative Systematic Review From The COVID-19 Pandemic In The UK 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.