Back

Solution architecture of G3BP1 reveals pH-dependent conformational switching underlying liquid-liquid phase separation

Han, X.; Sun, R.; Graewert, M. A.; Zhou, Q.; Resink, T.; Blanchet, C.; Ljunggren, H.-G.; Alici, E.; McInerney, G. M.; Farnebo, M.; Svergun, D.; Achour, A.

2026-03-02 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.03.27.645651 bioRxiv
Show abstract

G3BP1 is the central node and molecular switch in stress granule (SG) assembly. However, structural insights into full-length G3BP1 remain elusive owing to its extensive intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Using size-exclusion chromatography-coupled small-angle X-ray scattering (SEC-SAXS), we have characterized the solution architecture and conformational dynamics of full-length G3BP1. Under physiological conditions, G3BP1 adopts an elongated, head-to-head antiparallel homodimeric conformation, whereas acidification induces a pronounced conformational compaction. Subsequent biophysical studies reveal that this compact state enables robust RNA-mediated and, notably, homotypic phase separation in vitro. Deletion of the RGG region abolishes this acidity-induced compaction and markedly impairs phase separation, establishing a causal link between the RGG-dependent conformational switch and phase separation propensity. By moving beyond hypothetical models to experimental solution-state data, our work fills a longstanding void in the field and provides critical insights into the structural plasticity that underlies G3BP1 function, offering a missing structural link essential for deciphering the molecular mechanism of SG formation. We propose that stress-associated physicochemical changes, specifically localized acidification coupled with mRNA accumulation, trigger this reversible structural reconfiguration of G3BP1, thereby facilitating phase separation.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.