The development of a national bilingual cross-sectional questionnaire on attitudes towards supervised consumption sites and e-health overdose response interventions in Canada: The Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring (CNQOM)

BackgroundSupervised consumption sites (SCSs) and overdose response hotlines/applications (ORHAs) are harm reduction interventions aimed at reducing fatal overdose mortality. Little is known about key informant perspectives regarding these services. Herein, our objective is to describe the process of developing, testing, and distributing a novel national online questionnaire to measure perspectives and attitudes towards SCS and ORHAs among key informants in Canada. MethodsA bilingual online instrument (the Canadian National Questionnaire on Overdose Monitoring, CNQOM) was developed, pilot tested and revised with the aim of ensuring content and construct validity. Questionnaire respondents were recruited nationally from four key informant groups (People Who Use Substances, health professionals, emergency responders, and the general public) using a mix of purposive and representative sampling strategies. Respondents came from every province and territory in Canada, and respondents from the general public were proportionally represented. A stepwise response validation approach was used to remove invalid questionnaire responses. Test-retest reliability of instrument questions was assessed using Spearmans Rank Correlation, the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, and Cohens Kappa. ResultsA total of 4,445 valid responses was obtained from the four key informant groups following data cleaning. Test-retest reliability of instrument questions demonstrated slight to substantial stability in responses. DiscussionThe CNQOM is the first online questionnaire in Canada designed to capture perspectives and attitudes towards SCSs and ORHAs among diverse key informant groups. Our questionnaire was administered to a large, geographically diverse sample and designed to capture the perspectives of four key informant groups. Lower than expected test-retest reliability may be explained by lack of participant familiarity with SCS and especially ORHAs and the impersonal nature of the instrument content among some respondents. Future work will elucidate key informant perspectives on these services based on the data.