Supervised Machine-Learning Classification of Treatment-Resistant Depression in U.S. Claims Data
Wing, V. K.; Lerner, J.; Clarke, P.; O'Connor, S.; Tran, S.; Darer, J.; Gill, J.; Orsini, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundAccurate identification of individuals with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is important to facilitate timely access to appropriate care. However, this process currently depends on subjective provider assessments and onerous medication calculations in real-world data. To reduce the burden of TRD identification, we developed TRD classification models using data extracted from a claims database. MethodsUsing U.S. commercial claims data, we developed and tested two models using automated machine learning, as well as a rule-based model modified from a published TRD proxy. The highest performing model was designated the full-feature model. The parsimonious model was determined by implementing backward elimination and a clinically oriented consolidation strategy on the full-feature model. The rule-based model was adapted from a published proxy definition. ResultsThe full feature model (ridge logistic regression) demonstrated the highest overall performance (AUC=0.96, F1=0.64) with 306 features. Backward elimination and implementation of the feature consolidation strategy resulted in a parsimonious model (logistic regression) with acceptable performance (AUC=0.92, F1=0.53) comprising 8 drug-class features. The rule-based model (decision tree) had the lowest AUC (0.82) and F1 score (0.40). ConclusionsTo address the need for efficient TRD identification, we developed a parsimonious machine learning model capable of identifying individuals with TRD from claims data based on 8 drug class features. This model performs near the limit established by the full features model and has an interpretable architecture. Furthermore, it can be used to support population health and outcomes research and may reduce the subjectivity and variability in approaches to TRD identification in clinical practice.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Depression is Associated with Treatment Response Trajectories in Adults with Prolonged Grief Disorder: A Machine Learning Analysis 95%
- The Cost-Effectiveness Of Depression Screening For The General Adult Population 95%
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sociodemographic, clinical, and genetic factors associated with self-reported antidepressant response outcomes in the UK Biobank 95%
- Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and Adverse Drug Reactions Among Adults in a London Mental Health Service, 2008-2018 93%
- Pro-cognitive effects of 5-HT4 receptor agonism in individuals with remitted depression 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy with antidepressant treatment in patients with treatment-resistant depression in Japan 94%
- Symptom Monitoring based on Digital Data Collection During Inpatient Treatment of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders – a Feasibility Study 92%
- The Relationship between Cannabis Use and Cognition in People with Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Scoping Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 95%
- Neurovegetative symptom subtypes in young people with major depressive disorder and their structural brain correlates 93%
- Early identification of postpartum depression using demographic, clinical, and digital phenotyping 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Applications of Large Language Models in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review 94%
- Psychedelic mushrooms in the USA: Knowledge, patterns of use and association with health outcomes 92%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.