Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence Predictive Model to Accelerate Antibiotic Therapy for Critical Ill Children with Sepsis in the Pediatric ED with Pediatric ICU Disposition
Cao, K.; Braykov, N.; McCarter, A.; Kandaswamy, S.; Orenstein, E. W.; Ray, E.; Carter, R.; Gleeson, M. B.; Iyer, S.; Muthu, N.; Mai, M. V.
Show abstract
ImportancePediatric sepsis accounts for over 72,000 US hospitalizations annually with significant mortality and morbidity. Many pediatric hospitals struggle to promptly identify and treat sepsis. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a multi-tiered artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance sepsis clinical decision-making within a complex emergency department (ED) workflow. ObjectivesTo develop and validate a local AI model predicting critical sepsis among ED patients who received a fluid bolus and a disposition to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) but had not yet received antibiotics. DesignRetrospective observational cross-section study SettingUrban, quaternary-care, academic healthcare system PatientsPediatric ED patients InterventionsNone Measures and Main ResultsThe "Sepsis on ED to PICU Disposition" (SEPD) model aimed to predict critical sepsis within 72 hours of PICU disposition using a dataset totaling 5,534 patient encounters for model training and testing. During silent implementation, 1,058 encounters were used for validation. The SEPD model outperformed a vendor-developed sepsis model with an AUROC of 81.8%, compared to 57.5%. The model also demonstrated better precision-recall performance, showing more balanced identification of true positives. During silent implementation, the SEPD model maintained similar sensitivity (85.29%) and specificity (60.45%) to those observed during model testing. ConclusionThe SEPD model improved detection of critical sepsis among high-risk pediatric ED patients with a known PICU disposition, outperforming a vendor-developed sepsis model. Within a complex ED workflow, this model may facilitate timely sepsis identification and treatment in critically ill patients, who may have been missed during earlier stages of their ED course.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Divergence Between Net Fluid and Weight-Based Evaluation in Calculating Cumulative Fluid Balance 92%
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 92%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 95%
- Clinical prediction rule for SARS-CoV-2 infection from 116 U.S. emergency departments 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 94%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 93%
- Use of a Continuous Single Lead Electrocardiogram Analytic to Predict Patient Deterioration Requiring Rapid Response Team Activation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting Prognosis in COVID-19 Patients using Machine Learning and Readily Available Clinical Data 94%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 91%
- Analyzing Pain Patterns in the Emergency Department: Leveraging Clinical Text Deep Learning Models for Real-World Insights 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 92%
- A deep learning model for clinical outcome prediction using longitudinal inpatient electronic health records 92%
- A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Delirium from Electronic Health Records 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.