Observational Cross-Sectional Study to Estimate Population Norms in Eight Countries: the POPUP Study Protocol
Dewilde, S.; Tollenaar, N. H.; Phillips, G.; Paci, S.; Janssen, M. F.
Show abstract
This study protocol outlines the Population Norms Study (POPUP), a multinational digital survey aimed at establishing general population norms for medical resource use, comorbidities, sick leave, caregiver support, quality of life, and functioning across eight countries: United States (US), Canada, United Kingdom (UK), the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain, Italy, and Germany. Data will be collected through an online self-administered survey in two waves: the first in Q1 2021 and the second in Q1 2023, when first-wave responders will be recontacted. A total of 15,500 responses will be gathered across both waves: 9,000 in the first wave and 4,500 re-contacts in the second, with an additional 2,000 new contacts if needed. Representative panels will be recruited by a research company from each country based on age, gender, education, and region. Participants will complete the survey after providing informed consent. No personal identifiers will be recorded. The observational study involves no medical interventions, drugs, or devices, and will be submitted for Ethical Committee approval in each country. Descriptive statistics will be used for data analysis. The results are expected to provide a baseline for comparing health outcomes in specific patient populations and quantifying disease burden.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and determinants of persistent symptoms after infection with SARS-CoV-2: Protocol for an observational cohort study (LongCOVID-study) 96%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 94%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Study protocol for the Innovative Support for Patients with SARS-COV-2 Infections Registry (INSPIRE): a longitudinal study of the medium and long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection 93%
- STIMULATE-ICP-Delphi (Symptoms, Trajectory, Inequalities and Management: Understanding Long-COVID to Address and Transform Existing Integrated Care Pathways Delphi): Study Protocol 93%
- The Impact of Clinical Audits on Improving the Effectiveness of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) CARE in Primary Health Centers. A Comprehensive Pre-post analysis through Multi-layered Intervention: The ICAE-DM CARE study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing ChatGPT’s Mastery of Bloom’s Taxonomy using psychosomatic medicine exam questions 93%
- Substantial SF-36 score differences according to the mode of administration of the questionnaire: an ancillary study of the SENTIPAT multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing web-based questionnaire self-completion and telephone interview 93%
- Health indicators as a measure of individual health status: public perspectives 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Validity of the Parsley Symptom Index: an e-PROM designed for Telehealth 94%
- Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK 92%
- Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRS): application and psychometric analysis in a post-COVID-19 syndrome cohort 94%
- The modified COVID-19 Yorkshire Rehabilitation Scale (C19-YRSm) patient-reported outcome measure for Long Covid or Post-COVID syndrome 94%
- Evaluation Of A New “All In One” Sars-Cov-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Diagnostic Test And Self-Test: Diagnostic Performance And Usability On Child And Adult Population 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.