Dependence of higher-order correlations and information compression on temporal resolution in neuronal data
Jangjoo, F.
Show abstract
Studying higher order interactions in complex interacting systems based on limited data is inherently challenging. An additional, often overlooked factor is the temporal resolution at which data is presented for analysis. This study examines how temporal resolution influences the emergence of higher-order statistical dependencies and information representation in population level neuronal activity. Using a minimally biased data driven statistical inference framework, Minimally Complex Models, we studied grid-cell populations in the medial entorhinal cortex across a broad range of temporal resolutions. Results demonstrate that at intermediate temporal resolutions (100 milliseconds), the inferred model captures significant higher order dependencies alongside efficient information representations, whereas coarse resolutions lead to poor informative representation. These findings establish temporal resolution as a decisive factor in the inference of higher order neural structure and highlight that resolution-aware modeling is crucial for accurate analysis and characterization of collective dynamics in complex neuronal systems.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Likelihood-ratio test statistic for the finite-sample case in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models 95%
- Convergence, Sampling And Total Order Estimator Effects On Parameter Orthogonality In Global Sensitivity Analysis 94%
- Identification of Recurrent Dynamics in Distributed Neural Populations 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Robust Spike Sorting Method based on the Joint Optimization of Linear Discrimination Analysis and Density Peaks 95%
- A new, simple method of describing COVID-19 trajectory and dynamics in any country based on Johnson Cumulative Distribution Function fitting 95%
- Adaptive time scales in recurrent neural networks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.