On the impact of reference selection on variant calling in phylogenomics: How to avoid systematic error in target-enrichment studies of non-model organisms
Zhang, G.; Koehler, F.
Show abstract
Variant calling is a crucial step in identifying genetic variation in DNA sequences reconstructed from assembled sequencer reads. This study investigates the effect of reference genome selection on the reliability of variant calling and assesses the consequences of reference genome choice on phylogenomic analyses downstream. Employing an empirical exon capture sequence dataset, we used an analysis pipeline implemented in the Reference Genome based Phylogeny Pipeline (RGBEPP) that includes steps of quality control, read mapping, variant calling, and phylogenetic analysis. To examine how variant detection is influenced by reference genome choice, we assembled the exon capture dataset by using four different references for variant calling. These references were (1) a single ingroup sample, (2) the combined ingroup samples, (3) a distantly related species, and (4) a self-derived reference for each sample. We found that reference choice significantly impacted the variant detection and that these differences in variant detection also influenced the phylogenetic reconstructions downstream. Comparing the alignments and trees produced under use of various references shows that employing a sample-specific self-reference for variant calling maximizes the accuracy of the variant detection process. Based on this finding, we recommend incorporating self-referenced variant calling into phylogenomic assembly and analysis pipelines, such as RGBEPP, to ensure the robustness and reproducibility of phylogenomic analyses of low coverage sequence datasets from non-human species.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hybridization dynamics and extensive introgression in the Daphnia longispina species complex: new insights from a high-quality Daphnia galeata reference genome 95%
- Genome evolution and introgression in the New Zealand mud snails Potamopyrgus estuarinus and Potamopyrgus kaitunuparaoa 94%
- The genome of the rayed Mediterranean limpet Patella caerulea (Linnaeus, 1758) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- PhyloAln: a convenient reference-based tool to align sequences and high-throughput reads for phylogeny and evolution in the omic era 95%
- Broccoli: combining phylogenetic and network analyses for orthology assignment 93%
- MitoNGS: an online platform to analyze fish metabarcoding data in high-resolution 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Telomere-to-telomere assembly of the genome of an individual Oikopleura dioica from Okinawa using Nanopore-based sequencing 94%
- Copy number variation and elevated genetic diversity at immune trait loci in Atlantic and Pacific herring 93%
- A new Plasmodium vivax reference genome for South American isolates 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A High-quality Oxford Nanopore Assembly of the Hourglass Dolphin (Lagenorhynchus cruciger) Genome 94%
- High-Quality De Novo Genome Assembly for the Galapagos Endemic Lava Gull Using Oxford Nanopore Technologies 94%
- First Whole-Genome Assembly of the Galapagos Petrel (Pterodroma phaeopygia) Using Oxford Nanopore Sequencing to Advance Conservation Genomics in a Critically Endangered Seabird 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.