Back

Psychometric properties and local normative references of PSC-17, RCADS-25, CATS-2, SNAP-IV, MCHAT-R/F, and CAST: data from a nationwide sample in Greece

Simioni, A.; Schafer, J. L.; Marchionatti, L. E.; Schuster, K.; Casella, C. B.; Papanikolaou, K.; Kapsimalli, E.; Balikou, P.; Gerostergios, G.; Triantafyllou, K.; Basta, M.; Zilikis, N.; Athanasopoulou, L.; Dafoulis, V.; Serdari, A.; Rafael, V. S. B.; Szatmari, P.; Giannopoulou, I.; Koumoula, A.; Salum, G. A.; Kotsis, K.

2025-03-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.03.21.25324416 medRxiv
Show abstract

Health professionals in Greece face barriers in assessing child and adolescent mental health conditions due to the lack of instruments with evidence of validity in local samples. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the psychometric properties and establishing common norms for six globally recognized mental health tools in Greece: the Child and Adolescent Trauma Screen-2 (CATS-2), Pediatric Symptoms Checklist-17 (PSC-17), Revised Childrens Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25), Swanson, Nolan, and Pelham Scale (SNAP-IV), Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers-Revised (MCHAT-R/F), and Child Autism Spectrum Test (CAST). We drew on a nationwide Greek survey comprising 1,756 caregivers and 1,201 children and adolescents (age groups: 1 to 18 years). Using Item Response Theory, we assessed internal consistency and factor models according to Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) criteria for unidimensionality, local independence, monotonicity, and global model fit. Normative references were calculated using standardized metrics recommended by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Final sample sizes ranged from 1,356 (PSC-17, caregiver version) to 198 (CATS-2, caregiver version). Internal consistency was rated as good to excellent across all scales. Factor analyses supported all scales except the MCHAT-R/F (failing monotonicity) and CAST (failing monotonicity and unidimensionality). Local normative references were usually consistent with international samples. This toolkit provides essential evidence-based resources for child and adolescent mental health in Greece, offering a scalable model for other underserved settings. Further research with national probabilistic samples is recommended to enhance risk stratification accuracy.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
5
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
7
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
11
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.9%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.5%
16
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
22
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%