Designing a Substance Misuse Data Dashboard for Overdose Fatality Review Teams
Pisani, M.; Oguss, M. K.; Dickson-Gomez, J.; Kostelac, C.; Parry, A.; Moss, S. H.; Salisbury-Afshar, E.; Patterson, B. W.; Spigner, M. F.; Gussick, M.; Krautkramer, A.; Gruenloh, T.; Safipour Afshar, A.; Gupta, P.; Mayampurath, A.; Afshar, M.
Show abstract
ObjectiveOverdose Fatality Review (OFR) is a public health process in which cases of fatal overdose are carefully reviewed to identify prevention strategies. Current OFR requires review of multiple unconnected data sources, which is a manually intensive process. We aimed to use human factors design principles to develop a comprehensive dashboard that could facilitate enhanced processes to support OFR. Materials and MethodsWe first surveyed OFR leaders in Wisconsin using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) and conducted semi-structured interviews to identify targets for workflow optimization. Next, we developed a prototype dashboard for evaluation using a synthetic dataset built with Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (GPT-4). We subsequently performed iterative design sessions with heuristic evaluations, and end-user feedback on the final prototype was obtained via targeted surveys and semistructured interviews. ResultsThe NASA-TLX revealed a moderately high mental workload with the current workflow. Interviews affirmed that technological challenges and reliance on manual processes were contributory. The prototype dashboard addressed these concerns by integrating multiple data sources to generate population-level visualizations and patient-level event timelines. End-users reported the potential for improved efficiency and data accessibility compared to antecedent processes. DiscussionOFR is a data-intensive process that traditionally demands substantial manual effort. The data dashboard offers an informatics-based approach to streamline data aggregation and presentation, potentially enhancing the efficiency of case reviews. ConclusionImplementing a dashboard that consolidates and visualizes disparate data sources has the potential to alleviate the manual workload in overdose fatality review.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
- Virtual and remote opioid poisoning education and naloxone distribution programs: a scoping review 93%
- A proposed de-identification framework for a cohort of children presenting at a health facility in Uganda 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opinions of Former Jail Residents about Self-collection of SARS-CoV-2 Specimens, Paired with Wastewater Surveillance: A Qualitative Study Rapidly Examining Acceptability of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures 94%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 94%
- Health worker acceptability of an HIV testing mobile health application within a rural Zambian HIV treatment programme 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions and willingness of patients and caregivers on the utilization of patient-generated health data: a cross-sectional survey 92%
- How should job crafting interventions be implemented to make their effects last? Study protocol of group concept mapping 92%
- Identifying Online Advice-Seekers for Recovering from Opioid Use Disorder 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 92%
- “This is about the coolest thing I’ve ever seen is that you just showed right up.” COVID-19 testing and vaccine acceptability among homeless-experienced adults: Qualitative data from two samples 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- If you build it, will they use it? Use of a Digital Assistant for Self-Reporting of COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test Results during Large Nationwide Community Testing Initiative 93%
- Low adherence to existing model reporting guidelines by commonly used clinical prediction models 91%
- Electronic Health Record Documentation of Psychiatric Assessments in Massachusetts Emergency Department and Outpatient Settings During the COVID-19 Pandemic 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.