Back

Rapid tests as a practical alternative to slide agglutination for the confirmation of V. cholerae O1

Bhattacharjee, P.; Hegde, S. T.; Khan, A. I.; Nabil, I. K.; Hossain, M. N.; Rashmi, T. A.; Afrad, M. H.; Islam, T.; Amin, M. A.; Khan, Z. H.; Bhuiyan, T. R.; Azman, A.; Qadri, F.

2025-03-20 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.03.19.25324236 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesSlide agglutination is a crucial step for confirming cholera culture by determining serogroup/serotype. Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), typically used on stool, may provide a practical alternative, as they are easy to use, store and require minimal training. This study evaluates the concordance of V. cholerae O1/O139 detection from presumptive colonies by slide agglutination with RDTs. MethodsPatients ([≥]1 year) with acute watery diarrhea at the icddr,b Dhaka hospital were enrolled. Stool samples cultured on Thiosulfate-Citrate-Bile Salts-Sucrose media, and presumptive colonies were sub-cultured on Gelatin Agar. Isolates were then tested by slide agglutination and four commercial cholera RDTs. ResultsFrom 4-February-2024 through 31-January-2025, 1,331 patients with acute watery diarrhea were enrolled, 952 had presumptive colonies and 408 (31%) were culture-confirmed as V. cholerae O1. We tested 952, 505, 505, and 467 presumptive colonies with Cholkit, SD-Bioline, Crystal VC O1/O139, and Crystal VC O1 RDT kits, respectively. RDTs showed near-perfect concordance with slide agglutination. Using slide agglutination as the reference, the sensitivity of the RDT kits ranged from 99.5-100% and the specificity from 99-99.8%. No V. cholerae O139 was detected by slide agglutination or PCR. ConclusionsRDTs offer a practical, and potentially easier alternative to slide agglutination of presumptive cholerae colonies within typical cholera culture protocols. This may help to provide a pathway to quick confirmation of outbreaks in settings where lab facilities and reagents may be limited.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.