Back

Individual Differences in Effects of Stressful Life Events on Childhood ADHD: Genetic, Neural, and Familial Contributions

Choi, S. Y.; Yi, J.; Park, J.; Lee, E.; Kim, B.-G.; Kim, G.; Joo, Y. Y.; Cha, J.

2025-03-20 public and global health
10.1101/2025.03.18.25324229 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study elucidates the intricate relationship between stressful life events and the development of ADHD symptoms in children, acknowledging the considerable variability in individual responses. By examining these differences, we aim to uncover the unique combinations of factors contributing to varying levels of vulnerability and resilience among children. MethodsUtilizing longitudinal data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study (baseline: N=6303, age=9.9), we applied Generalized Random Forest to model the non-linear relationships among genetic predispositions, brain features, and environmental factors. ResultsSignificant individual variability was observed in childrens ADHD symptoms post-stress, particularly at the 1-year and 2-year follow-ups. At the 1-year follow-up, increased vulnerability was indicated by heightened parental mental health problems and a lower polygenic risk score for smoking. By the 2-year follow-up, escalated parental mental health disorders, higher ADHD polygenic risk scores, and altered structural connectivity in the cognitive control network were significant contributors to individual differences. ConclusionsThese findings underscore the importance of integrating environmental, genetic, and neural variables to identify children vulnerable or resilient to developing ADHD symptoms following early-life stress. This study demonstrates how multimodal data combined with non-parametric machine-learning can advance precision psychology and psychiatry, aiding targeted support for affected children.

Published in Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.