Patient Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Care: A Scoping Review
Hilbers, D.; Nekain, N.; Bates, A.; Nunez, J.-J.
Show abstract
PURPOSETo synthesize existing literature on patient attitudes toward AI in cancer care and identify knowledge gaps that can inform future research and clinical implementation. DESIGNA scoping review was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were searched for peer-reviewed primary research studies published until February 1, 2025. The Population-Concept-Context framework guided study selection, focusing on adult patients with cancer and their attitudes toward AI. Studies with quantitative or qualitative data were included. Two independent reviewers screened studies, with a third resolving disagreements. Data were synthesized into tabular and narrative summaries. RESULTSOur search yielded 1,240 citations, of which 19 studies met the inclusion criteria, representing 2,114 patients with cancer across 15 countries. Most studies used quantitative methods (n=9) such as questionnaires or surveys. The most studied cancers were prostate, melanoma, breast, and colorectal cancer. While patients with cancer generally supported AI when used as a physician-guided tool, concerns about depersonalization, treatment bias, and data security highlighted challenges in implementation. Trust in AI was shaped by physician endorsement and patient familiarity, with greater trust when AI was physician-guided. Geographic differences were observed, with greater AI acceptance in Asia, while skepticism was more prevalent in North America and Europe. Additionally, patients with metastatic cancer were underrepresented, limiting insights into AI perceptions in this population. CONCLUSIONThis scoping review provides the first synthesis of patient attitudes toward AI across all cancer types and highlights concerns unique to patients with cancer. Clinicians can use these findings to enhance patient acceptance of AI by positioning it as a physician-guided tool and ensuring its integration aligns with patient values and expectations.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 93%
- Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation 92%
- Cracking the Code: A Scoping Review to Unite Disciplines in Tackling Legal Issues in Health Artificial Intelligence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 94%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 96%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 92%
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 93%
- Challenges and facilitators in pathways to cancer diagnosis in Southern Africa: A qualitative study 92%
- Addressing the Needs and Identifying Supports for Parents of Chronically Ill Adolescents and Young Adults in their Shared Transition from Pediatric to Adult Care: A Scoping Review Protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using a Multilingual AI Care Agent to Reduce Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Higher FIT Test Adoption Among Spanish-Speaking Patients 94%
- Improving Patient Engagement in Phase 2 Clinical Trials with a Trial-specific Patient Decision Aid (tPDA): A Development and Usability Study 93%
- Understanding how the design and implementation of Online Consultations influence primary care outcomes: Systematic review of evidence with recommendations for designers, providers, and researchers 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.