Time trends and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in early childhood development at 2 to 2.5 years old in England between 2019 and 2024
Chua, Y. W.; Murray, C.; Munford, L.; Bennett, D.; Hargreaves, D.; Taylor-Robinson, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceInternationally, there are gaps in data to monitor both early childhood development (ECD) and progress in closing the inequality gap. The unequal impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, and any differential impact on ECD domains is also not poorly understood. ObjectiveTo examine time trends and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in ECD at 2 2.5 years in England between 2019 and 2024 DesignCross-sectional and longitudinal ecological analysis Setting149 local authorities in England Participants143 local authorities (662 annual observations, publishable quality data and at least 75% coverage of eligible children) ExposureYear of assessment, area-level socioeconomic conditions (Index of Multiple Deprivation 2019, Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI)) assessed as the Slope Index of Inequality (SII) and Relative Index of Inequality (RII)) Main outcomesAges and Stages Questionnaire 3, rate per 100 not developmentally on track (Five domains of development: Communication, Gross Motor, Fine Motor, Personal Social, or Problem Solving; and any domain) ResultsRate per 100 children not developmentally on track in any domain increased progressively from 2019 (16[95%CI: 14.2; 16.9]), and was highest in 2023 (20.6[18.9; 22.4]) and 2024 (19.8[18.2; 21.4]). Compared to 2019 rates, the largest absolute increase was in 2023 (4.9[3.6; 6.3]), largest for Communication (4.3[3.5; 5.2], followed by similar increases for Personal Social (3.3[2.5; 4]) and Problem Solving (2.9[2.2; 3.5]), and smaller increases for Fine Motor (1.4[0.6; 2]) and Gross Motor (0.9[0.2; 1.6]). All rates except Gross Motor remained elevated in 2024. On average, 21.3[19.5; 23.0] per 100 children were not on track in any domain for the most income-deprived quintile compared to 16.2[14.7;17.8] for the least income-deprived (SII: 2.9[1.8; 3.9]; RII: 23%[14%; 32%]). Inequalities were largest in Communication (SII: 2.8[2.0; 3.6]; RII: 36%[25%; 49%]). Year by area-level socioeconomic conditions interaction effects were not statistically significant. Conclusions and RelevanceIn England, ECD worsened during the pandemic, more so for children exposed for longer, or from a younger age. Children born after the pandemic continue to be affected. Area-level inequalities were striking but did not worsen during this period. Pandemic-recovery efforts need to consider the potentially enormous economic and societal cost of disruption to ECD. Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSWhat are the time trends and area-level socioeconomic inequalities in early childhood development at 2 to 2.5 years in England around the time of the COVID-19 pandemic? FindingsEarly childhood development at 2 to 2.5 years in England worsened in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. Stark socioeconomic inequalities were observed throughout the period of 2019 to 2024. MeaningPolicy makers need to prioritise early years and children services in pandemic recovery efforts to improve early developmental outcomes, especially for children from socioeconomically deprived backgrounds.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Indirect effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric health-care use and severe disease: a retrospective national cohort study 95%
- Deficits in hospital care among clinically vulnerable children aged 0 to 4 years during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Child Mortality in England During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Vulnerabilities in child wellbeing among primary school children: a cross-sectional study in Bradford, UK 94%
- Inequalities in healthcare disruptions during the Covid-19 pandemic: Evidence from 12 UK population-based longitudinal studies 94%
- Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of clinically extremely vulnerable children and children living with clinically extremely vulnerable people in Wales: A data linkage study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of SARS-CoV-2 testing, PCR-confirmed infections and COVID-19--related hospital admissions in children and young people: birth cohort study 93%
- Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents born very preterm and its correlates: a cross-sectional study 91%
- Staff-Pupil SARS-CoV-2 Infection Pathways in Schools: A Population Level Linked Data Approach 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 92%
- The impact of mandatory COVID-19 certificates on vaccine uptake: Synthetic Control Modelling of Six Countries 91%
- Detecting COVID-19 infection hotspots in England using large-scale self-reported data from a mobile application: a prospective, observational study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole population cohorts versus sampled comparators designs for evaluating health and educational outcomes of children with inborn rare conditions: a simulation study 91%
- Information bias of vaccine effectiveness estimation due to informed consent for national registration of COVID-19 vaccination: estimation and correction using a data augmentation model 89%
- Analyses of academician cohorts generate biased pandemic excess death estimates 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.