PREACT-digital: Study protocol for a longitudinal, observational multi-center study on wearable- and EMA- based predictors of non-response to CBT for internalizing disorders
Hammelrath, L.; Brose, A.; Heinrich, M.; Zagorscak, P.; Burchert, S.; Langhammer, T.; Knaevelsrud, C.
Show abstract
IntroductionDespite CBTs status as a first-line treatment, a substantial proportion of patients does not experience sufficient symptom relief. Recent advances in wearable technology and smartphone integration enable new, ecologically valid approaches to capture dynamic processes in real time. By combining ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with passive sensing of behavioral and physiological information, this project seeks to track daily fluctuations in symptom-associated constructs like affect, emotion regulation and physical activity. Our central goal is to determine whether dynamic, multimodal markers derived from EMA and passive sensing can predict treatment non-response and illuminate key factors that drive or hinder therapeutic change. Methods and AnalysisPREACT-digital is a subproject of the Research Unit FOR 5187 (PREACT), a large multicenter observational study in four outpatient clinics. PREACT channels state of the art machine learning techniques to identify predictors of non-response to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) in internalizing disorders. The study is currently running and will end in May 2026. Patients seeking cognitive behavioral therapy at one of four participating outpatient clinics are invited to join PREACT-digital. They can take part in (1) a short version with a 14-day EMA and passive sensing phase prior to therapy, or (2) a long version in which the short versions assessments are extended throughout the therapy. Participants are provided with a smartwatch and a customized study app. We collect passive data on heart rate, physical activity, sleep, and location patterns. EMA assessments cover affect, emotion regulation strategies, context and therapeutic agency. Primary outcomes on (non)-response are assessed after 20 therapy sessions and therapy end. We employ predictive and exploratory analyses. Predictive analyses focus on classification of non-response, using basic algorithms (i.e. logistic regression, gradient boosting) for straightforward interpretability, and advanced methods (LSTM, DSEM) to capture complex temporal and hierarchical patterns. Exploratory analyses investigate mechanistic links, examine the interplay of variables over time, and analyze change trajectories. Study findings will inform more personalized and ecologically valid approaches to cognitive behavioral therapy for internalizing disorders. Ethics and DisseminationThe study has received ethical approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Department of Psychology at Humboldt Universitat zu Berlin (Approval No. 2021-01) and the Ethics Committee of Charite-Universitatsmedizin Berlin (Approval No. EA1/186/22). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. One year after the last patient out, data will be fully anonymized to allow for open science practices and data sharing, while at the same time securing patients data protection rights. Trial registration numberDRKS00030915; OSF PREACT: http://osf.io/bcgax; OSF PREACT-digital: https://osf.io/253nb Strengths and limitations of this studyO_LILarge sample of clinical patients starting CBT: Rare in digital phenotyping studies C_LIO_LILongitudinal assessment combining passive sensing and EMA: Captures a dynamic, multidimensional view of participants behaviors, emotions, and physiological states; Enables analysis of within-person trajectories. C_LIO_LIState-of-the-art, consumer-grade scanwatches for all participants: Ensures high-quality, standardized data collection across participants; Ensures privacy of participant by not disclosing them as study participants C_LIO_LINo healthy control group: Limits the ability to distinguish clinical from non-clinical patterns in digital phenotyping data C_LIO_LIParticipant burden due to extensive assessments might decrease adherence and influence therapy outcomes C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of easy-to-implement anti-stress interventions in a series of N-of-1 trials: Study protocol of the Anti-Stress Intervention Among Physicians Study (ASIP) 95%
- Development of medical device software for the screening and assessment of depression severity using data collected from a wristband-type wearable device: SWIFT study protocol 95%
- Patients with affective disorders profit most from telemedical treatment: Evidence from a naturalistic patient cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of Visual and Auditory Digital Markers of Suicidality in Acutely Suicidal Psychiatric In-Patients 94%
- Uncovering social states in healthy and clinical populations using digital phenotyping and Hidden Markov Models 93%
- Combining AI and human support in mental health: a digital intervention with comparable effectiveness to human-delivered care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Mobile App for Prolonged Grief among Bereaved Parents: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Modified Alliance-Focused Training with Doubling as an integrative approach to improve therapists’ competencies in dealing with alliance ruptures and prevent negative outcome in psychotherapy for depression. Study protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial 94%
- The Basel Long COVID Cohort Study (BALCoS): protocol of a prospective cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the Clinical Feasibility of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Clinical Decision Support System: A Longitudinal Feasibility Study 96%
- Development of the NeuroFlow Severity Score and Comparison With Validated Measures for Depression and Anxiety 94%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.