Back

Registered Report: Replication and Extension of Nozaradan, Peretz, Missal and Mouraux (2011)

Nave, K. M.; Hannon, E. E.; Snyder, J. S.; Replication of Auditory Frequency Tagging Consortium,

2025-03-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.13.643168 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cognitive neuroscience has long sought to disentangle stimulus-driven processing from conscious perceptual processing. Some prior evidence for neural processing of perceived musical beat (periodic pulse) may be confounded by stimulus-driven activity. Notably, Nozaradan et al. (2011) controlled for stimulus factors and used frequency tagging to show increased brain activity at imagery-related frequencies when listeners imagined a beat pattern during an isochronous stimulus. However, it remains unclear whether this effect is replicable and whether it reliably reflects conscious beat perception. This registered report presents 13 independent replications using the same vetted protocol. Listeners performed the same experimental paradigm as in Nozaradan et al. (2011), with an added behavioral task on each trial to assess conscious perception of the imagined beat. Pre-registered meta-analyses revealed smaller raw effect sizes of imagery condition (Binary: 0.03 uV, Ternary: 0.03 uV) than the original study (Binary: 0.12 uV, Ternary: 0.20 uV), with confidence intervals all overlapping with 0. Differences in full-sample estimated effect sizes (this study: n = 152, eta squared = .03-.04; 2011 study: n = 8, eta squared = .62-.76) suggest larger sample sizes are necessary to detect these effects reliably, if they exist. Additionally, only neural activity at the stimulus frequency predicted imagery task accuracy, contradicting our hypothesis that beat-related frequencies would predict performance. Our findings suggest an overall failure to replicate all main effects from the original study. We discuss potential reasons for discrepancies with the original study as well as implications for the utility of frequency tagging for studying beat perception.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
3
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.2%
4
Consciousness and Cognition
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
6
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
9
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
12
Cerebral Cortex Communications
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience of Consciousness
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
18
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
19
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.3%
21
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
22
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
24
Cerebral Cortex
357 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
27
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Brain Topography
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%