Back

Impact of a Smart Phone-Based Educational Video on Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy Adherence: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Chew, K.; Galeano, D.; Behin, D.; Kumar, A.; Maheshwari, R.; Aliasi-Sinai, L.; Southern, W.; Arora, S.

2025-03-15 gastroenterology
10.1101/2025.03.13.25323456 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsInadequate bowel preparation and high cancellation rates hinder the effectiveness of colonoscopy screening programs. We aimed to evaluate the impact of a novel, personalized video messaging platform on bowel preparation quality and colonoscopy adherence. MethodsWe conducted a before-after intervention study at a large urban academic medical center, comparing outcomes between a historical control group (April-September 2022) and an intervention group receiving personalized video messages (July-November 2023). Primary outcomes were inadequate bowel preparation and colonoscopy cancellation/rescheduling rates. Propensity score matching and multivariable logistic regression were used to adjust for potential confounders. ResultsAmong 1,647 patients who underwent colonoscopy, inadequate bowel preparation occurred in 12.0% of the intervention group versus 20.0% of the historical control group in the propensity score matched analysis (p=0.041). In the larger cohort of 2,802 scheduled patients, the propensity score matched analysis showed a trend toward a 31% reduction in odds of cancellation or rescheduling associated with the educational video, although this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.01, p=0.056). For the logistical regression model, the video was associated with a 42% reduction in odds of cancellation or rescheduling (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77, p<0.001). ConclusionsImplementation of a personalized video messaging platform was associated with significant improvements in bowel preparation quality and substantial reductions in colonoscopy cancellations/rescheduling. This easily scalable, low-cost intervention has the potential to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of colonoscopy screening programs.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.