Effects of Parent Race on Communication During Elective Pediatric Surgery Consultations
Lowe, C.; Beach, M. C.; Saha, S.; Links, A. R.; Boss, E. F.
Show abstract
ImportanceChildren of marginalized racial groups have poorer surgical outcomes compared to White children. Clinical communication may contribute to these disparities. ObjectiveWe explore racial differences in parent-clinician communication during initial consultations for elective surgical procedures in children. DesignCross-sectional study of communication during consultations between surgical clinicians and parents of children (age 2-17) referred for initial evaluation for tonsillectomy/adenoidectomy, hernia repair, and circumcision between 2016 and 2023. SettingAcademically affiliated outpatient clinics in the Baltimore, Maryland region. ParticipantsParent-clinician dyads including 22 surgical clinicians and 153 parents. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Visits were audio-recorded and coded using the Roter Interaction Analysis System. Outcomes included visit-level measures (parent versus clinician verbal dominance and patient-centeredness ratio), clinician communication (facilitation/activation statements to encourage parent participation, emotional statements, social chit-chat, and positive affect), and parent communication (emotional statements, social chit-chat, positive affect). We used generalized estimating equations to test associations of parent race with visit communication, accounting for nesting of visits within clinicians and adjusting for parent sociodemographic variables. ResultsOf the 153 parents, 63 (41.2%) were Black and 90 (58.8%) were White. Of the 22 clinicians, 14 (63.6%) were White and 8 (36.4%) reported other or multiple ethnicities. In unadjusted models, visits with Black parents had higher clinician verbal dominance but no difference in overall patient-centeredness scores relative to visits with White parents. However, visits with Black parents had fewer clinician chit-chat statements, fewer total parent statements, fewer parent emotional statements, fewer parent chit-chat statements, and lower parent positive affect. After adjusting for parent sociodemographic variables, clinician verbal dominance remained significantly higher, with clinicians making 0.4 more statements per parent statement (95% CI: 0.1 to 0.7). Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of communication during pediatric surgical consultations, parent race was associated with differences in clinician, parent, and interactive visit communication, although some differences appeared to be mediated by sociodemographic factors and most were due to differences in parent rather than clinician communication. Application of patient-centered communication and engagement strategies may help to bridge social distance in pediatric surgical care. Key PointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow does parent-clinician communication differ by parent race during initial pediatric surgery consultations? FindingsIn this cohort study, consultations with Black parents had higher clinician verbal dominance, less parent emotional expression, and less social chit-chat (both parent and clinician) relative to visits with White parents. MeaningOur findings reveal opportunities to mitigate racial differences in communication and bridge social distance in pediatric surgical care, including through improved clinician elicitation of patient and family concerns and intentional attempts to build rapport.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What matters to patients?: a timely question for Value Based Care 93%
- Prohibiting Babel - A call for professional remote interpreting services in pre-operation anaesthesia information 92%
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The PUPPY Study - Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Exploring Problems Coordinating and Accessing Primary Care for Attached and Unattached Patients Exacerbated During the COVID-19 Pandemic Year 91%
- Scientific hypothesis generation process in clinical research: a secondary data analytic tool versus experience study protocol 91%
- Exposure to and engagement with digital psychoeducational content and community related to maternal mental health by perinatal persons and mothers: design of an online survey with optional follow-up and participant characteristics 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The patient experience of COVID-19: A qualitative investigation with symptomatic outpatients 93%
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 92%
- Clinical, Behavioral and Social Factors Associated with Racial Disparities in Hospitalized and Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients from an Integrated Health Care System in Georgia 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of Primary Care Team Configuration on Access and Quality of Care 93%
- Association of patients’ past misdiagnosis experiences with trust in their current physician: the TRUMP 2 -Net study 92%
- An Evaluation of the Vulnerable Physician Workforce in the United States During the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- An Observational Study of COVID-19 from A Large Healthcare System in Northern New Jersey: Diagnosis, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes 92%
- A distinct symptom pattern emerges for COVID-19 Long-Haul: A nationwide study 91%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.