People living alone with neurodegenerative conditions: a scoping review protocol
Martyr, A.; Caulfield, M.; Charlwood, C.; Gamble, L. D.; Prina, M.; Oyebode, J. R.; Hulme, C.; Clare, L.
Show abstract
IntroductionPeople living alone with neurodegenerative conditions face unique difficulties in maintaining independence and accessing appropriate health and social care support. Consolidating current understanding regarding these unique difficulties would better inform health and social care services and enable more tailored and appropriate service delivery. The proposed scoping review will summarise evidence from studies that provide evidence about people with dementia, Parkinsons disease, Huntingtons disease, or motor neurone disease who live alone. Methods and AnalysisThis scoping review protocol uses well-established methodology outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis and the Joanna Briggs Institute. Relevant publications will be searched using PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL and AgeLine via EBSCOhost, and EMBASE, PsycInfo, and Social Policy and Practice via Ovid. Grey literature will be searched via Google looking specifically for pdf documents. No date restrictions will be applied to the searches. For research publications a two-stage screening approach will be undertaken. The first stage will involve screening titles and abstracts for relevant literature on people with neurodegenerative conditions living alone in the community. The second stage will involve full text screening of selected articles. For grey literature the first 20 pdfs per website identified in Google will be downloaded and screened. Summary data will be extracted from publications selected for inclusion. Data synthesis will involve tabulating study characteristics and findings and preparing narrative summaries to identify commonalities, gaps, and areas for future research. Ethics and DisseminationEthical approval is not required for this review. Consultation with people with lived experience, stakeholders and experts linked with the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Policy Research Unit in Dementia and Neurodegeneration University of Exeter (DeNPRU Exeter), will help to ensure the relevance and applicability of findings. Dissemination will include a policy report and a peer-reviewed publication aimed at informing policy, practice, and improving support services for people living alone with neurodegenerative conditions. Article SummaryStrengths and limitations of this study O_LIThe use of a rigorous and well-established methodological framework will enhance the quality and structure of the review. C_LIO_LIA comprehensive search will be conducted in 7 databases will maximise identification of all possible records that meet the inclusion criteria of the review. C_LIO_LIThe inclusion of grey literature will complement the research literature by providing detail about guidance being given to people living with and people caring for neurodegenerative conditions. C_LIO_LIA limitation is that the literature search will be restricted to articles published in English. This increases the risk that relevant information will be missed. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 95%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 94%
- Memory for Music (M4M) protocol for an international randomized controlled trial: Effects of individual intensive musical training based on singing in non-musicians with Alzheimer's disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 95%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 94%
- Ageing and Dementia: Age-Period-Cohort Effects of Policy Intervention in England, 2006-2016 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of long-term care utilization during the last five years of life among Swedish older adults with and without dementia 94%
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 93%
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for falls in community-dwelling older adults: An umbrella review 91%
- Nurse-physician Communication around Identifying Palliative Care Needs in Nursing Home Residents 90%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 94%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 92%
- Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and mortality in older adults with and without pre-injury dementia 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.