Back

Fluoxetine Delivery for Wound Treatment Through an Integrated Bioelectronic Device - Pharmacokinetic Parameters and Safety Profile in Swine

Gallegos, A.; Li, H.; Yang, H.-Y.; Villa-Martinez, G.; Bazzi, I.; Sathyanarayanan, S.; Asefifeyzabadi, N.; Baniya, P.; Hee, W. S.; Siadat, M.; Chang, E.; Pasumarthi, S.; Teodorescu, M.; Gomez, M.; Rolandi, M.; Isseroff, R.

2025-03-13 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.03.11.642735 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Wound infections are a significant medical challenge, often leading to chronicity or systemic infection. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) have emerged as potential non-antibiotic candidates with demonstrated ability to limit growth and biofilm formation in Gram-negative bacteria, in addition to their pro-healing activity. Here, we compared direct delivery of the SSRI fluoxetine by topical bolus dosing to delivery from an iontophoresis bandage device with an actuator for temporally controlled drug delivery, in a porcine excisional wound model. Device delivery of fluoxetine resulted in a maximum concentration of 12.25 ng fluoxetine per mg tissue, compared to 2.926 ng/mg following bolus dosing, and tissue fluoxetine levels were higher after application using the device than after bolus dosing across the range of doses tested (p=0.0041). The half-life of fluoxetine in the wound tissue was 0.988 {+/-} 0.256 days. Fluoxetine was not detected in the pig plasma, and plasma serotonin levels were not affected by the topical application. Fluoxetine delivery using the device, but not bolus delivery, produced tissue concentrations above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for some clinically important species of bacteria. The experimental device can effectively deliver topical fluoxetine to the wound, producing higher tissue concentrations of fluoxetine at lower cumulative doses compared to bolus dosing, and with minimal risk of off-target effects. The device may simplify wound treatment by reducing the burden for daily drug application, possibly increasing adherence to a prescribed treatment regimen.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.5%
2
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
4
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
9
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
10
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Advanced Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
17
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
18
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
20
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
Molecular Pharmaceutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
29
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%