Interpretable multivariate survival models: Improving predictions for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimers disease (AD) via data fusion and machine learning
Rosales-Gurmendi, D. S.; Fumagal-Gonzalez, G. A.; Orozco, J.; Farber, J.; Trevino, V.; Martinez-Ledesma, E.; Martinez-Torteya, A.; Rosales-Gurmendi, F.; Tamez-Pena, J.
Show abstract
Accurately predicting which individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) will progress to Alzheimers disease (AD) can improve patient care. This study examines the role of quantitative MRI (qMRI), cognitive evaluations, apolipoprotein{varepsilon} 4 (APOE {varepsilon}4), and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in Cox survival models to predict progression from MCI to AD. Data from 564 participants in the ADNI study, who transitioned from MCI to AD, were analyzed. The data set included 330 features encompassing qMRI, cognitive assessments, CSF biomarkers, and APOE {varepsilon}4 status. Advanced machine learning (ML) methods were applied to evaluate the importance of these data sources, select relevant features, and develop interpretable Cox survival models within a cross-validation framework. The top optimized model achieved a sensitivity of 0.69, 95% CI [0.63, 0.76], and a specificity of 0.87, 95% CI [0.83, 0.90], and used all data sources. The results demonstrated that combining qMRI features with cognitive assessments, CSF biomarkers, and APOE {varepsilon}4 status, analyzed using the BSWiMS model, resulted in a substantial improvement in the ability to predict progression from MCI to AD, achieving 81% precission and 87% specificity. These results exceed those obtained with other models evaluated. Finally, biomarker analysis showed that cognitive scores are the most relevant features to predict conversion, followed by CSF and qMRI biomarkers. These findings highlight the value of integrating multiple data sources in highly interpretable Cox survival models for the early identification of individuals at risk for Alzheimers disease.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Screening for early-stage Alzheimer's disease using optimized feature sets and machine learning 98%
- Topographical overlapping of the Aβ and Tau pathologies in the Default mode networks predicts Alzheimer’s Disease with higher specificity 97%
- An AI-assisted Online Tool for Cognitive Impairment Detection Using Images from the Clock Drawing Test 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison and aggregation of event sequences across ten cohorts to describe the consensus biomarker evolution in Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- ADataViewer: Exploring Semantically Harmonized Alzheimer’s Disease Cohort Datasets 95%
- White matter integrity is associated with cognition and amyloid burden in older adult Koreans along the Alzheimer’s disease continuum 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- NeuropsychBrainAge: a biomarker for conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer’s disease 97%
- Fully Automated MRI-based Analysis of the Locus Coeruleus in Aging and Alzheimer's Disease Dementia using ELSI-Net 96%
- Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.