Back

Self-assessment and rest-activity monitoring for effective bipolar disorder management: a longitudinal actigraphy study

Pfaffenseller, B.; Schneider, J.; de Azevedo Cardoso, T.; Simjanoski, M.; Alda, M.; Kapczinski, F.; Bakstein, E.

2025-03-13 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2025.03.11.25323782 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRecurrent course and disruption of circadian rhythms are among the core features of bipolar disorder (BD). Thus, ongoing symptom monitoring is an essential part of good clinical management. ObjectiveWe conducted a study to validate the English version of the ASERT (Aktibipo questionnaire), a tool for self-assessment of mood symptoms. We also analyzed the relationship of self-assessed symptoms with clinician ratings and actigraphy measures, and investigated the possibility of predicting depressive episodes using subjective and digital measures. MethodsThis was a longitudinal study of individuals with BD, followed for up to 11 months. The participants completed weekly mood self-assessments (ASERT) using a smartphone app and wore wrist actigraphs. During monthly appointments, the severity of their mood symptoms was rated by clinicians, and the participants completed questionnaires addressing overall functioning (FAST), and biological rhythms (BRIAN). ResultsThe study confirmed the validity and reliability of the ASERT as a measure of subjective mood. Additionally, we found significant associations between ASERT responses, clinical scales, and actigraphy data. In our analysis, a combination of self-assessment and actigraphy data detected depression relapse with 67% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 81% balanced accuracy. Furthermore, we observed a strong correlation between the stability of daily routine and overall functioning, emphasizing the significance of circadian rhythm disruptions in BD. ConclusionThis study highlights the potential of digital tools, such as digitally administered self-assessments and actigraphy, to enhance the management of BD by providing valuable insights into mood states and detecting relapse. Further research is needed to refine and optimize these tools for widespread clinical application, such as informing personalized treatment plans.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
6
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.0%
9
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
13
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
14
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
15
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
16
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
18
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
19
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.6%
21
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%