Predict community-acquired pneumonia outcome using time series data and machine learning
Lozano-Rojas, D.; Richardson, M.; Woltmann, G.; Free, R. C.
Show abstract
BackgroundCommunity-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is an acute respiratory condition associated with high mortality in adult populations and is potentially more serious in older patients. Accurate and consistently applied prediction of outcome may contribute to reduce in-hospital mortality. Currently, CAP outcomes are assessed with clinical scores like CURB65, based on signs and symptoms that are non-specific to the disease. Recent literature has shown that machine learning (ML) has the potential to improve outcome prediction, but the sparse and incomplete nature of the data present a challenge for the development of models that can be implemented clinically. MethodsThis study aimed to developed ML models that can support outcome prediction in hospital admissions with CAP using routinely collected and time-dependent data from Leicester hospitals. Thus, by modelling mortality prediction, and predicting URB65 on the third day of admission with the forecast of vital signs, implementing a methodology that explores how different characteristics involved in the training process influence the results of the predictions. ResultsData comprised 9390 admissions in the training set, and 7892 in the validation set, for thirty-four clinical variables (fifteen time-dependent). Results of CAP mortality modelling reported AUC of 0.77 using a GRU model that was trained with the time series of vital signs and blood test. Results also showed improvement in models when balancing classes of the target variable in the training set, as well as improvement when using time dependent data. And importantly when predicting URB65 accuracy of 0.85 was obtained when modelled using GRU, when time series were processed using local scaling. ConclusionsThis approach might represent an opportunity to anticipate adverse outcomes. These results suggest that ML models utilising time series can have sizable impact in the prediction of CAP outcome, from many perspectives: Complementing currently applied scoring systems approaches like CURB65 in hospital settings, prediction of mortality or forecasting the severity of patients from vital signs that have shown correlation with CAP mortality. The models presented require further validation and development, although they present important indication for CAP mortality prediction.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving irregular temporal modeling by integrating synthetic data to the electronic medical record using conditional GANs: a case study of fluid overload prediction in the intensive care unit 97%
- Machine Learning Interpretability Methods to Characterize the Importance of Hematologic Biomarkers in Prognosticating Patients with Suspected Infection 95%
- AI-MET: A Deep Learning-based Clinical Decision Support System for Distinguishing Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children from Endemic Typhus 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Between High Income and Low-Middle Income Countries for Enhanced Model Fairness and Generalizability 95%
- Using explainable machine learning to identify patients at risk of reattendance at discharge from emergency departments 94%
- Machine learning for classifying chronic kidney disease and predicting creatinine levels using at-home measurements 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 97%
- From theoretical models to practical deployment: A perspective and case study of opportunities and challenges in AI-driven healthcare research for low-income settings 93%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.