Back

Modular coupling of structure-function reveals network integration (rather than segregation) as the key mechanism for cognitive task discrimination

Fernandez Iriondo, I.; Jimenez Marin, A.; Aginako, N.; Zamora Lopez, G.; Erramuzpe, A.; Bonifazi, P.; Cortes, J.

2025-03-11 health informatics
10.1101/2025.03.10.25323674 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how structural and functional brain networks interact to support cognitive processes remains a central challenge in systems neuroscience. In this study, we investigate the dynamics of structure-function coupling (SFC) at the modular level across different cognitive tasks using multimodal neuroimaging data, including anatomical, diffusion, functional at rest and functional at different tasks. By constructing high-resolution structural and functional connectivity matrices, we assessed intra-modular (SFC-INT) and inter-modular (SFC-EXT) coupling to examine their roles in task-specific reorganization. Our results reveal that variations in SFC during cognitive tasks are primarily driven by changes in inter-modular coupling, emphasizing network integration over segregation. Specifically, tasks demanding higher cognitive flexibility, such as the gender stroop task, exhibited increased SFC-EXT, indicating enhanced integration between modules. In contrast, tasks focused on memory processing showed a tendency toward segregation, with lower SFC-EXT values. These findings highlight the significance of inter-modular integration as a flexible and dynamic mechanism underlying cognitive task discrimination. Our study advances the understanding of modular brain network dynamics, suggesting that the brains ability to integrate information across modules plays a pivotal role in cognitive flexibility and task performance.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.