Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A coproduced logic model of the role of context in shaping child health
Kneale, D.; O'Mara-Eves, A.; Candy, B.; Cain, L.; Catchpole, J.; Chesworth, A.; Oliver, S.; Sutcliffe, K.; Hutchinson Pascal, N.; Thomas, J.
Show abstract
IntroductionThere is increasing work towards drawing on theory, implementing co-production, and accounting for complexity within the production of systematic reviews for public health. In this paper, we report on the process of co-producing a theory, in this case a graphical articulation of theory in the form of a logic model, which describes how contextual factors influence childrens health. MethodsWe undertook a series of three online co-production workshops involving 18-20 participants in each, and worked with an advisory group of experts with professional and lived expertise. An online virtual whiteboard was used to support the identification of factors that contributed to poorer childhood health, explanations for these factors, and connections between different factors. ResultsWe initially focussed our work on childhood obesity. However, co-production was transformational in switching the focus of the logic model away from a narrow focus on Body Mass Index as a measure of obesity, to a more holistic theory of factors that shape childrens health, recognised as the intersection between healthy eating, physical activity and mental wellbeing. Theorising with a diverse range of co-producers helped us to recognise the stigmatising impacts that an exclusive focus on clinical measures of childrens health can have, and the way that a narrow clinical focus inhibits theorising the complexity and drivers of poorer health. ConclusionCo-production led to a switch in theorising away from narratives of childrens health that focus closely on personal responsibility, towards narratives that explore structural and contextual drivers of health. Patient or Public ContributionThe logic model was entirely driven by the contributions of researchers, those with lived experience (e.g. as parents and/or who have experienced poor health), and those with professional experience (e.g. as teachers) who worked together to co-produce the model. An advisory group composed of people with a similar range of expertise helped to shape the conduct of co-production and dissemination (including in the preparation of this manuscript).
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic scoping review of adult obesity policy actions and weight-related services in a region of the United Kingdom using the Behaviour Change Wheel 95%
- A whole system approach to increasing children’s physical activity in a multi-ethnic UK city: a process evaluation protocol 94%
- A mixed methods study evaluating food insecurity and diet quality in households accessing food aid in England 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unpacking the behavioural components and delivery features of early childhood obesity prevention interventions in the TOPCHILD Collaboration: a systematic review and intervention coding protocol 95%
- Impact of school closures on the health and well-being of primary school children in Wales UK; a routine data linkage study using the HAPPEN survey (2018-2020) 94%
- Cohort Profile: Health and Attainment of Pupils in a Primary Education National-Cohort (HAPPEN). A hybrid total population cohort in Wales, UK 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Co-production of an online research and resource platform for improving the health of young people - The HYPE Project 93%
- Factors influencing wellbeing in young people during COVID-19: A survey with 6291 young people in Wales 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A protocol for a systematic critical realist synthesis of school mindfulness interventions designed to promote pupils’ mental wellbeing 93%
- Impact of relaxing Covid-19 social distancing measures on rural North Wales: a simulation analysis 91%
- Applying machine-learning to rapidly analyse large qualitative text datasets to inform the COVID-19 pandemic response: Comparing human and machine-assisted topic analysis techniques 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preventing childhood obesity primary schools: a realist review from UK perspective 95%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.