Back

Predicting cognition using estimated structural and functional connectivity networks and artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis

Tozlu, C.; Ong, D.; Piccirillo, C.; Schwartz, H.; Jaywant, A.; Nguyen, T.; Jamison, K. W.; Gauthier, S. A.; Kuceyeski, A.

2025-03-11 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.07.642094 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundOur prior work demonstrated that estimated structural and functional connectomes (eSC and eFC) generated using multiple sclerosis (MS) lesion masks and artificial intelligence (AI) models can predict disability as effectively as SC and FC derived from diffusion and functional MRI in MS. The goal of this study was to assess the ability of eSC and eFC in predicting baseline and 4-year follow-up cognition in MS patients. MethodsOne hundred seventy-one MS patients (age: 42.67{+/-}10.41, 74% females) were included. The Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT), California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT), and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test (BVMT) were used to assess cognition. The Network Modification tool was performed to estimate SC, which was then used as an input to Krakencoder, an encoder-decoder model, to estimate FC. Ridge regression was performed to predict cognition using regional eSC and eFC, along with demographics and clinical information as well as conventional MRI metrics. Baseline cognition was added to the models that were used to predict the follow-up cognition. Spearmans correlation (r) was used to assess the prediction accuracy. ResultsThe highest accuracy was obtained when predicting follow-up SDMT using regional eSC or eFC (median r=0.58 for eSC and r=0.56 for eFC). Decreased eSC and eFC in the cerebellum and increased eFC in the default mode network were associated with lower follow-up SDMT scores. Baseline SDMT, clinical subtype, and age were the most important non-connectome metrics in predicting follow-up SDMT. ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that eSC and eFC derived from clinically acquired MRI and AI models can effectively predict cognition. The use of lesion-based estimates of connectome disruptions may potentially improve cognition-related individualized treatment planning.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.8%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.5%
3
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.8%
7
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.9%
10
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
16
Experimental Neurology
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
20
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
21
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Neurobiology of Disease
134 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
26
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.5%
28
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
29
Journal of Neurology
26 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
30
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%