Back

CABaNe, an automated, high content ImageJ macro for cell and neurite analysis

Thibieroz, N.; Cordelieres, F.; Lopes Cardoso Filho, J.-C.; Machillot, P.; Marchadier, L.; Singh, A.; Picart, C.; Migliorini, E.

2025-03-10 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.03.07.641590 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Measuring neurite length is crucial in neurobiology because it provides valuable insights into the growth, development, and function of neurons. In particular, neurite length is fundamental to study neuronal development and differentiation, neurons responses to drugs, neurodegenerative diseases and neuronal plasticity. Surprisingly, there is currently a lack of tools for high content neurite analysis. In this article, we present CABaNe, as an open source, high content, rule based Image J macro for cell analysis, including their neurite length. This macro possesses a graphical interface, metadata production, as well as verification means before and after analysis. Rule based and machine learning based programming have been tested for cell identification. After testing, we had better precision and adaptability using rule based cell identification. We challenged CABaNe with currently used techniques, which are manual or assisted. When tested on a small sample, CABaNe demonstrated a massive speed increase in capacity to treat dataset while maintaining or increasing precision when compared to manual measurement. When tested on a large data set, comparing different conditions, we successfully highlighted differences between conditions, in a fully automated manner. Therefore, CABaNe is viable as a high content option for cell analysis, for neurite length and other parameters. It is a base of code that can be used for other analysis or to train deep learning models. In the future, we expect this tool to be widely used in both basic and applied neurobiology research. Significance statementWhen studying neuronal cell differentiation, an important morphological parameter is neurite length. This parameter requires measuring the protrusions length of analysed cells. However, this analysis done manually can be long, as each individual cell must be measured independently. Currently, efficient single cell tools exist to assist the measurement, such as NeuronJ. However, there is currently no available automated tool for this analysis, and manual techniques suffer operator bias. In this paper, we present a macro to fully automatize neurite length and other parameters measurement, for each cell, in each image, in each condition.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
3
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.1%
5
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
7
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.2%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.2%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.2%
10
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
11
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
19
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
21
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
23
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
24
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%