Deep generative models for vessel segmentation in CT angiography of the brain
van Voorst, H.; Su, J.; Konduri, P.; Majoie, C.; Roos, Y.; Emmer, B.; Marquering, H.; de Vos, B.; Caan, M.; Isgum, I.
Show abstract
Automated vessel segmentation in brain CT angiography (CTA) remains challenging despite the potential benefit of applications. Expert acquisition of reference vessel segmentations is a laborious task. We propose an unsupervised generative deep learning approach that can be trained for vessel segmentation in brain CTA using a large dataset (n=908) of unlabelled brain CTAs and non-contrast enhanced CTs (NCCTs). Our unsupervised approach uses a conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) for CTA to NCCT translation by generating a contrast map that allows for automatic extraction of vessel segmentations. Furthermore, we propose a 3D Frangi filter-based loss function to enhance tubular structures in the contrast map to improve vessel segmentations. We used a hold-out test set of 9 CTA volumes with manually annotated reference segmentations. We compared our unsupervised approach with a state-of-the-art supervised nnUnet, trained and evaluated with test set using 9-fold nested cross-validation. Evaluation metrics included voxel-wise Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), true positive rate (TPR), and false positive rate (FPR). The DSC was 4% lower for the unsupervised approach (DSC: 0.74) compared to the supervised nnUnet (DSC: 0.78). Both the TPR and FPR were higher for the unsupervised approach (TPR: 0.75, FPR/1000 voxels:2.05) compared to the supervised nnUnet (TPR:0.71, FPR/1000 voxels:0.87). Hence, the quantitative results showed that our unsupervised method approaches a supervised state-of-the-art segmentation network. The results demonstrate that an unsupervised generative deep learning approach for the segmentation of intracranial vessels is feasible without laborious manual segmentations. HighlightsO_LITo train supervised segmentation models laborious manual segmentations are needed C_LIO_LIUnsupervised generative deep learning does not require manual segmentations C_LIO_LIOur unsupervised method combines L1, adversarial, and a novel Frangiloss C_LIO_LIVarying loss function combinations can reduce false positives or false negatives C_LIO_LIOur method approached the performance of a state-of-the-art supervised nnUnet C_LI
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- STAMP: Simultaneous Training and Model Pruning for Low Data Regimes in Medical Image Segmentation 95%
- Automated 3D reconstruction of the fetal thorax in the standard atlas space from motion-corrupted MRI stacks for 21-36 weeks GA range 95%
- Comparison of domain adaptation techniques for white matter hyperintensity segmentation in brain MR images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- FFCM-MRF: An accurate and generalizable cerebrovascular segmentation pipeline for humans and rhesus monkeys based on TOF-MRA 95%
- Reconstructing microvascular network skeletons from 3D images: what is the ground truth? 94%
- Application of a convolutional neural network to the quality control of MRI defacing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modeling 3D Mesoscaled Neuronal Complexity through Learning-based Dynamic Morphometric Convolution 93%
- Age-informed, attention-based weakly supervised learning for neuropathological image assessment 93%
- Modeling Brain Connectivity Dynamics in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging via Particle Filtering 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.