Back

Deep generative models for vessel segmentation in CT angiography of the brain

van Voorst, H.; Su, J.; Konduri, P.; Majoie, C.; Roos, Y.; Emmer, B.; Marquering, H.; de Vos, B.; Caan, M.; Isgum, I.

2025-03-19 health informatics
10.1101/2025.03.07.25322919 medRxiv
Show abstract

Automated vessel segmentation in brain CT angiography (CTA) remains challenging despite the potential benefit of applications. Expert acquisition of reference vessel segmentations is a laborious task. We propose an unsupervised generative deep learning approach that can be trained for vessel segmentation in brain CTA using a large dataset (n=908) of unlabelled brain CTAs and non-contrast enhanced CTs (NCCTs). Our unsupervised approach uses a conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) for CTA to NCCT translation by generating a contrast map that allows for automatic extraction of vessel segmentations. Furthermore, we propose a 3D Frangi filter-based loss function to enhance tubular structures in the contrast map to improve vessel segmentations. We used a hold-out test set of 9 CTA volumes with manually annotated reference segmentations. We compared our unsupervised approach with a state-of-the-art supervised nnUnet, trained and evaluated with test set using 9-fold nested cross-validation. Evaluation metrics included voxel-wise Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), true positive rate (TPR), and false positive rate (FPR). The DSC was 4% lower for the unsupervised approach (DSC: 0.74) compared to the supervised nnUnet (DSC: 0.78). Both the TPR and FPR were higher for the unsupervised approach (TPR: 0.75, FPR/1000 voxels:2.05) compared to the supervised nnUnet (TPR:0.71, FPR/1000 voxels:0.87). Hence, the quantitative results showed that our unsupervised method approaches a supervised state-of-the-art segmentation network. The results demonstrate that an unsupervised generative deep learning approach for the segmentation of intracranial vessels is feasible without laborious manual segmentations. HighlightsO_LITo train supervised segmentation models laborious manual segmentations are needed C_LIO_LIUnsupervised generative deep learning does not require manual segmentations C_LIO_LIOur unsupervised method combines L1, adversarial, and a novel Frangiloss C_LIO_LIVarying loss function combinations can reduce false positives or false negatives C_LIO_LIOur method approached the performance of a state-of-the-art supervised nnUnet C_LI

Published in Computers in Biology and Medicine (predicted rank #3) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.7%
2
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
Computers in Biology and Medicine · published here
128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.4%
4
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
8
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
13
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
14
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
15
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
16
NMR in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
17
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
19
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
20
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
21
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
22
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
24
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
25
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
27
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
30
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%