A Deep Learning Framework for Causal Inference in Clinical Trial Design: The CURE AI Large Clinicogenomic Foundation Model
Weiss, A. D.; Fomin, V.; Feng, D.; Tang, Z.; Cai, J.; John, B.; Pfister, N. T.
Show abstract
Clinical research is limited by the capability to define the most important combinations of clinical features and biomarkers that predict therapeutic benefit. Here, we introduce CURE AI (Clinical trials Uncovering Real Efficacy Artificial Intelligence), a novel deep learning framework designed to predict individual patient benefit from a new therapeutic intervention compared to a standard of care. CURE AI utilizes a large clinicogenomic foundation model to understand the complex relationships between the vast clinical and multiomic features in clinical trial data. To build CURE AI, we trained a proprietary foundation model based on a deep learning architecture and training schema using a large collection of clinical and multiomics datasets. Using CURE AI, we seek to understand the complex interplay between clinicogenomic information from clinical trial arms to predict the magnitude of therapeutic benefit on the individual patient level. In this paper, we finetuned the CURE AI foundation model on lung cancer data from the OAK non-small cell lung cancer clinical trial. We observed that the trial could have been significant for progression-free survival (PFS) with fewer than half of the patients enrolled using CURE AI to guide trial enrollment (p = 0.60 to p < 0.05). The finetuned CURE AI (termed CURE Lung Cancer) demonstrated direct generalizability on a held-out independent clinical trial dataset, the POPLAR trial, by converting an insignificant PFS endpoint to significance while also including the majority of patients (88%; p = 0.21 to p < 0.05). In summary, we developed a causally-aware clinicogenomic deep learning platform that can learn to predict individualized patient benefit of investigational therapy compared to an existing standard of care. Because we use a foundation model trained on readily measurable patient characteristics, CURE AI can be applied to a variety of scientific and clinical uses including adaptive clinical trials, toxicity prediction, treatment response prediction, and understanding of drug resistance and response mechanisms.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards Predicting 30-Day Readmission among Oncology Patients: Identifying Timely and Actionable Risk Factors 92%
- Histology-based Prediction of Therapy Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinomas Using Deep Learning 92%
- CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Federated Target Trial Emulation using Distributed Observational Data for Treatment Effect Estimation 93%
- A Scoping Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trial Risk Assessment 93%
- Exploring the Feasibility of Using Real-World Data from a Large Clinical Data Research Network to Simulate Clinical Trials of Alzheimer’s Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Design and implementation of the multi-arm, multi-stage Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19 (TICO) platform master protocol: An Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) initiative 92%
- Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: a scoping review 91%
- A modular pipeline for natural language processing-screened human abstraction of a pragmatic trial outcome from electronic health records 91%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.