Monitoring Report: GLP-1 RA Prescribing Trends - December 2024 Data
Gratzl, S.; Cartwright, B. M. G.; Rodriguez, P. J.; Gilbert, K.; Do, D.; Masters, N. B.; Stucky, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundLimited recent data exist on prescribing patterns and patient characteristics for glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), an important drug class used as anti-diabetic medication (ADM) for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and/or anti-obesity medication (AOM) in patients with overweight or obesity. For brevity, we use the term GLP-1 RA to refer to both GLP-1 RA and dual GLP-1 RA/GIP medications. ObjectiveTo describe recent trends in prescribing and dispensing of GLP-1-based medications in the US. MethodsUsing a subset of real-world electronic health record (EHR) data from Truveta, a growing collective of health systems that provide more than 18% of all daily clinical care in the US, we identified people who were prescribed a GLP-1-based medication between January 01, 2019 and December 31, 2025. We describe prescribing volumes and patient characteristics over time, by medication, and by FDA-labeled use. Among the subset of patients for whom post-prescription dispensing data is available, we describe the proportion and characteristics of patients who were and were not dispensed a GLP-1 RA following their prescription. Results2,185,238 patients were prescribed a GLP-1 RA between January 2019 and December 2025, with 11,194,909 total prescriptions during this period. Among first-time prescriptions for which use could be established, 69.1% were ADMs and 30.9% were AOMs. Overall prescribing rates (GLP-1 RA prescriptions per total prescriptions) increased slightly from September to December 2025 (+5.02%); however, first-time prescribing rates declined over the same period (-6.62%). As of December 2025, GLP-1 RA prescriptions account for more than 7% of all prescriptions.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 93%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 91%
- Trends in analgesia prescribing in primary care in Ireland and England between 2014 and 2022 - a repeated cross-sectional study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 93%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 92%
- Trends and variation in prescribing of suboptimal statin treatment regimes: a cohort study in English primary care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acute Pain Pathways: protocol for a prospective cohort study 93%
- How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England. 91%
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Data-driven identification of potentially successful intervention implementations: a proof of concept using five years of opioid prescribing data from over 7000 practices in England 91%
- Association of Opioid Use Disorder With 2016 Presidential Voting Patterns: A Cross-Sectional Study in New York State at Census Tract Level 89%
- Comorbidities might be a risk factor for the incidence of COVID-19: Evidence from a web-based survey of 780,961 participants 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 93%
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 93%
- Extent and causes of the collapse in the registration of innovative medications in Lebanon: A mixed-methods analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.