Publication Type Tagging using Transformer Models and Multi-Label Classification
Menke, J. D.; Kilicoglu, H.; Smalheiser, N. R.
Show abstract
Indexing articles by their publication type and study design is essential for efficient search and filtering of the biomedical literature, but is understudied compared to indexing by MeSH topical terms. In this study, we leveraged the human-curated publication types and study designs in PubMed to generate a dataset of more than 1.2M articles (titles and abstracts) and used state-of-the-art Transformer-based models for automatic tagging of publication types and study designs. Specifically, we trained PubMedBERT-based models using a multi-label classification approach, and explored undersampling, feature verbalization, and contrastive learning to improve model performance. Our results show that PubMedBERT provides a strong baseline for publication type and study design indexing; undersampling, feature verbalization, and unsupervised constrastive loss have a positive impact on performance, whereas supervised contrastive learning degrades the performance. We obtained the best overall performance with 80% undersampling and feature verbalization (0.632 macro-F1, 0.969 macro-AUC). The model outperformed previous models (MultiTagger) across all metrics and the performance difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Despite its stronger performance, the model still has room for improvement and future work could explore features based on full-text as well as model interpretability. We make our data and code available at https://github.com/ScienceNLP-Lab/MultiTagger-v2/tree/main/AMIA.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- LCD Benchmark: Long Clinical Document Benchmark on Mortality Prediction for Language Models 95%
- Analysis of Eligibility Criteria Clusters Based on Large Language Models for Clinical Trial Design 95%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- CONSORT-TM: Text classification models for assessing the completeness of randomized controlled trial publications 97%
- Repurposing Non-pharmacological Interventions for Alzheimer’s Diseases through Link Prediction on Biomedical Literature 94%
- Synthetic data for privacy-preserving clinical risk prediction 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.