Back

Genomic and morphological characterisation of a novel iridovirus, bivalve iridovirus 1 (BiIV1), infecting the common cockle (Cerastoderma edule)

Hooper, C.; Tidy, A. M.; Jessop, R.; Bateman, K. S.; Green, M. J.; Ross, S. H.; Ward, G. M.; Hazelgrove, R.; Hunt, J. E.; Parker, M.; Bass, D.

2025-03-10 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.03.05.641634 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1High rates of mortality of the common cockle, Cerastoderma edule, have occurred in the Wash Estuary, UK since 2008. A previous study linked the mortalities to a novel genotype of Marteilia cocosarum, with a strong correlation between cockle moribundity and the presence of M. cocosarum. Here, we characterise a novel iridovirus, identified by chance during metagenomic sequencing of a gradient purification of Marteilia cells, with presence also correlated to cockle moribundity. The novel 179,695 bp iridovirus, bivalve iridovirus 1 (BiIV1), encodes 193 predicted open reading frames and has a 41% G+C content. BiIV1 clusters together with other aquatic invertebrate iridoviruses in phylogenetic analyses and has a similar genome size to other invertebrate iridoviruses. Comparative analysis revealed that BiIV1 has lost three genes that were previously thought to be common amongst all iridoviruses but has also gained genes, potentially from horizontal transfer from its bivalve mollusc host(s). Electron microscopy showed 158 nm icosahedral virions present in the haemocytes of cockles, typical of those observed in host tissues infected with viruses of the family Iridoviridae. Prevalence of BiIV1 in moribund cockles was higher than that in apparently healthy cockles at most sites in the Wash Estuary, with up to 100% PCR prevalence in moribund cockles. Our findings provide the first genome for a bivalve-infecting iridovirus and identify a second bivalve-associated iridovirus in publicly available genomic datasets, adding to the knowledge of invertebrate iridovirus genomics and diversity.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.