Back

Characterization of Demographics, Drug Latency, and Mortality of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions in an FDA Pharmacovigilance Database

Mukherjee, E. M.; Park, D.; Martin-Pozo, M.; Phillips, E. J.

2025-03-06 dermatology
10.1101/2025.03.05.25323441 medRxiv
Show abstract

ImportanceSevere cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), and generalized bullous fixed drug eruption (GBFDE), are rare but life-threatening drug hypersensitivity syndromes. Due to their low incidence and diagnostic complexity, large-scale characterization of SCAR is challenging. ObjectiveTo characterize the demographics, causative agents, trends, latency, and phenotypic overlap of SCAR using a large-scale, sanitized pharmacovigilance dataset from FAERS (FDA Adverse Event Reporting System). DesignCross-sectional study of spontaneous adverse event reports. Cases were drawn from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FDA FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2023 and subjected to sanitization and deduplication. Disproportionality analysis was used to characterize causative agents. Machine learning (random forest classifiers) was used to analyze predictors of drug latency and mortality. SettingGlobal pharmacovigilance reports submitted to FAERS. ParticipantsA total of 56,683 deduplicated SCAR reports were identified, representing 0.33% of reports during the study period. ExposuresSuspected causative drugs, including both small molecules and biologics. Main Outcomes and MeasuresMain outcomes included the frequency and distribution of SCAR syndromes, reporting trends over time, latency from drug start to reaction onset, drug-specific disproportionality (PRR, ROR, IC), and co-reporting between SCAR types and related conditions. ResultsA total of 56,683 unique SCAR reports were identified, including SJS-TEN (28,871), DRESS (22,444), AGEP (6,183), and GBFDE (150). We identified 237 drugs with significant disproportionality for SCAR overall. Co-reporting between SCARs was significantly enriched (p < 10-200), suggesting overlapping phenotypes. Latency varied by drug and syndrome (median: GBFDE 3 days, AGEP 4 days, SJS-TEN 15 days, DRESS 24 days). Conclusions and RelevanceSCAR syndromes display distinct but overlapping phenotypes, with variable latency and diverse causative agents. These findings, based on the largest SCAR dataset to date, highlight the need for improved classification frameworks and molecular validation. Large-scale pharmacovigilance, integrated with genomic and histopathologic data, will be critical to improving diagnosis, mechanistic understanding, and clinical management of SCAR.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.3%
5
Blood Advances
54 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.6%
8
JCI Insight
241 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
12
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
13
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
14
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
The FASEB Journal
175 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Allergy
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
20
The Lancet Rheumatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
27
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
29
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%