A New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) versus goal-setting and routine care: longer term outcomes of a single-masked, phase 3, superiority Randomised Controlled Trial
Yilmaz, M.; Vickerstaff, V.; Budgett, J.; Barber, J.; Cooper, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundNIDUS-Family is a manualised intervention, deliverable by non-clinical facilitators which is clinically (on Goal Attainment Scaling - GAS) and cost effective over 12 months. AimsTo evaluate whether goal setting plus NIDUS-Family was more effective than control (goal-setting and routine care) in supporting dyads (family carers and care recipients with dementia) attainment of personalised goals at 18 and 24 months; and participant perceived goal relevance over 24-months. MethodA single-masked, randomised controlled trial recruiting dyads from community settings. Randomisation used a 2:1 ratio (intervention: control). NIDUS-Family is tailored to goals dyads set by selecting modules involving behavioural interventions, carer support, psychoeducation, communication, enablement and environmental adaptations. It involved 6-8 video-call/telephone sessions over 6 months, then follow-ups 2-3 monthly for 6 months. Our primary outcome was GAS at 18 and 24 months. Secondary outcomes assessed care recipient functioning, quality of life, time until care home admission or death, carer anxiety and depression. Primary analysis, a mixed-effects model, accounted for randomization group, study site, time, intervention-arm facilitator and repeated measurements. ResultsIn 2020-21, 204 participants were randomised to intervention and 98 to control. 164 (54.3%) and 141(46.7%) dyads completed 18 and 24-month outcomes respectively. In the primary analysis, including 277 participants contributing 6-, 12-, 18- or 24-month outcomes, adjusted GAS mean differences (intervention-control) at 18 and 24-months were 11.78 (95% CI (Confidence Interval) 6.64,16.93) and 8.67 (3.31,14.02). Secondary outcome comparisons were not significant. The hazard ratio for dying or care home admission was 0.80 (0.45,1.42) (intervention v control); and 0.87 (0.41,1.82) and 0.59 (0.26,1.33) for death and care home admission respectively. Of baseline GAS goals, carers considered 436 (78.0%) relevant at 18 and 383 (78.5%) at 24 months. ConclusionsThe NIDUS-Family intervention improved personalised attainment of GAS goals that remained relevant for most dyads, over two years. Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN11425138.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 94%
- Home-based Extended Rehabilitation for Older People with Frailty (HERO): a Randomised Controlled Trial 93%
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 96%
- Development and validation of prediction models for predicting social care strengths and vulnerability in older people: Cohort study using routine data in Adult Social Care 93%
- Effectiveness of dyadic interventions in improving outcomes for adults with multiple long-term conditions and/or frailty and their informal carers: A systematic review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality of Care Home Residents and Community-Dwelling Controls During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020: Matched Cohort Study 92%
- Impact of Vitamin D supplementation on cognition in adults with mild to moderate vitamin D deficiency: Outcomes from the VitaMIND randomised controlled trial 91%
- Effect of a simple exercise programme on hospitalisation-associated disability in older patients: a randomised controlled trial. 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 93%
- A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment 91%
- Race/Ethnic Disparities in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The Northern Manhattan Study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.