Identifying biomedical entities for datasets in scientific articles - A 4-step cache-augmented generation approach using GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0
Giuliani, C.; Benadi, G.; Engel, F.; Werner, J.; Watter, M.; Schwarzer, G.; Gross, O.; Zeiser, R.; Binder, H.; Kaier, K.
Show abstract
The accurate annotation of biomedical entities in scientific articles is essential for effective metadata generation, ensuring data findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability in collaborative research. This study introduces a novel 4-step Cache-Augmented Generation (CAG) approach to identify biomedical entities, leveraging GPT-4o and PubTator 3.0. The method integrates (1) GPT-4o-based entity generation, (2) PubTator-based validation, (3) term extraction based on a metadata-schema developed for the specific research area, and (4) a combined evaluation of PubTator-validated and schema-related terms. Applied to 23 articles published in the context of the Collaborative Research Centre OncoEscape, the process was validated through supervised, face-to-face interviews with article authors, allowing an assessment of annotation precision using random effects meta-analysis. The approach yielded a mean number of 19.6 schema-related and 6.7 PubTator-validated biomedical entities per article. Overall precision was 98% [95%CI 94%-100%]. In a subsample (N=20), available supplemental material was included in the prediction process, which did not increase precision (98%, CI 95%-100%). Moreover, the mean number of schema-related (20.1, p=0.561) and PubTator-validated (6.7, p=0.681) biomedical entities did not increase with the additional information provided with the supplement. This study highlights the potential of CAG for metadata annotation. The findings underscore the practical feasibility of full-text analysis for routine metadata annotation in biomedical research.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Annotation-preserving machine translation of English corpora to validate Dutch clinical concept extraction tools 95%
- Automating literature screening and curation with applications to computational neuroscience 95%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19-related research data availability and quality according to the FAIR principles: A meta-research study 95%
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 95%
- The Rise of Open Data Practices Among Bioscientists at the University of Edinburgh 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.