Adherence to preventive behaviors related to Covid-19 in Taiwan in 2020-2021: a population-based follow-up survey
Wu, C.-Y.; Lan, C.-C.; Jian, S.-W.; Yang, C.-C.; Hsu, W.-C.; Chen, P.-C.; Chang, S.-S.; Lin, H.-H.
Show abstract
ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic was associated with significant changes in preventive behaviors worldwide. We conducted a cohort follow-up survey to understand these behavioral changes in Taiwan during 2020 and 2021. MethodsA population-based survey with three follow-up rounds was implemented among individuals aged 20 and older. The survey included questions about perceptions of COVID-19 risk and adherence to preventive behaviors promoted by the Taiwan CDC in its New Life Strategies. ResultsBetween July and September 2020, a period with no local COVID-19 cases, adherence to indoor and outdoor social distancing was 51.5% and 63.5%, respectively, while 81.4% of people indicated they would wear facial masks if social distancing could not be practiced. In stratified analysis, females and the elderly exhibited significantly higher adherence to most of the preventive measures. We observed an increase in adherence to preventive behaviors from 2020 to the middle of 2021, with no signs of fatigue. ConclusionsThe survey provided critical empirical evidence on the adherence to preventive behaviors in the general population in Taiwan during the first two years of the pandemic. As non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPI) are essential measures during the early stage of any pandemic, we believe that regular monitoring of preventive behaviors could serve as a foundation for pandemic preparedness. More efforts are needed to identify the most feasible and cost-effective methods for surveillance of preventive behaviors.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Social distancing and preventive practices of government employees in response to COVID-19 in Ethiopia 94%
- Comprehensive profiling of social mixing patterns in resource poor countries: a mixed methods research protocol 94%
- Serological Survey in a university community after the fourth wave of COVID-19 in Senegal 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gender Differences in Health Protective Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Taiwan: An Empirical Study 96%
- How is the COVID-19 pandemic impacting our life, mental health, and well-being? Design and preliminary findings of the pan-Canadian longitudinal COHESION Study 93%
- Awareness, knowledge and trust in the Greek authorities towards COVID-19 pandemic: results from the Epirus Health Study cohort 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of the COVID-19 pandemic in rural Odisha, India: knowledge, preventative actions, and impacts on daily life 93%
- Variability in physical inactivity responses of university students during COVID-19 pandemic: A monitoring of daily step counts using a smartphone application 93%
- Temporal Geospatial Analysis of COVID-19 Pre-infection Determinants of Risk in South Carolina 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spread of infection and treatment interruption among Japanese workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study 95%
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices among the general population during COVID-19 outbreak in Iran: A national cross-sectional survey 93%
- Protocol of a Study to Benchmark Occupational Health and Safety in Japan: W2S-Ohpm Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in the prevalence of the common risk factors for non-communicable diseases in Uganda between 2014 and 2023: Informed by nationally representative cross-sectional surveys 94%
- Urban pandemic response: survey results describing the experiences from twenty-five cities during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- How do local-level authorities engage in epidemic and pandemic preparedness activities and coordinate with higher levels of government? Survey results from 33 cities 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.