Back

Excess mortality in England and Scotland in 2022: The long shadow of austerity and the return to an unacceptable pre-pandemic baseline

Bradford, D. R. R.; Brown, D.; McCartney, G.; Douglas, M.; Dundas, R.; Walsh, D.

2025-03-04 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.03.03.25323230 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere are concerns that mortality remains elevated after peaks COVID-19. This study examined whether mortality rates in England and Scotland in 2022 were excessive compared to rates predicted by austerity-era (2012-2019) and pre-austerity (2001-2010) trends. MethodsA linear time trend analysis was conducted using mortality data from 2001-2022. The outcomes were observed and expected age- and sex-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs; standardised to the 2013 European Standard Population). Expected ASMRs in 2022 were calculated independently based on austerity-era and pre-austerity trends. Excess deaths were estimated by comparing observed and expected ASMRs. ResultsIn 2022, ASMRs were higher than predicted by austerity-era trends but substantially higher than pre-austerity trends. Relative excesses in England for females were 4.4% (4.0-4.8) and 38.2% (95% CI: 37.7-38.7), respectively; for males, excesses were 7.2% (6.8-7.6) and 57.0% (56.4-57.6). Relative excesses in Scotland for females were 3.4% (2.2-4.5) and 26.6% (25.2-28.0); for males, excesses were 2.6% (1.5-3.8) and 45.2% (43.6-46.9). COVID-19 accounted for 5.3-6.5% of deaths in 2022 and explained much of the excess relative to austerity-era trends. ASMRs in the most deprived areas were 1.68-1.94 times higher than in the least deprived. ConclusionMortality was higher than predicted by both austerity-era and pre-austerity trends. Deaths attributable to COVID-19 explain a substantial proportion of the excess based on austerity-era trends. However, the 879,430 excess deaths relative to pre-austerity trends, even after excluding direct COVID-19 deaths, highlights the devastating impacts of austerity on public health. KEY MESSAGESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topic?C_ST_ABSMortality in England and Scotland remained elevated following the peaks of 2020 and 2021 caused by COVID-19, indicating a further worsening of the unprecedented stalling of mortality rates observed from around 2012. What this study addsWhile COVID-19 explained much of the 2022 excess mortality relative to projections based on austerity-era trends, far greater excesses emerged when compared to projections based on the consistent decline in mortality observed prior to austerity. How this study might affect research, practice or policyThese findings highlight the profound, long-term harm of austerity, particularly in deprived areas, with an estimated 879,430 excess deaths between 2013 and 2022. The study strengthens calls for urgent policy action to reverse austeritys effects and reduce health inequalities.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
17.2%
3
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.7%
11
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
14
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
16
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
BMJ Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
22
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%