Back

Explainable advanced electrocardiography has a high negative predictive value for ruling out significant coronary artery disease on cardiovascular computed tomography

Rajamohan, M.; Loewenstein, D. E.; Maanja, M.; Yang, K. X.; Cheepvasarach, C.; Schlegel, T.; Ugander, M.; Kozor, R.

2025-03-03 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.03.02.25323182 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDAdvanced electrocardiography (A-ECG) has been used to improve the diagnostic performance of the ECG in a number of cardiac disease states. We hypothesised that A-ECG can improve the diagnostic assessment of intermediate risk chest pain by optimising an A-ECG score for significant coronary artery disease (CAD) by cardiovascular computed tomography (CCT). METHODSParticipants attending an outpatient rapid access chest pain clinic underwent a 12-lead ECG and CCT. Significant CAD was defined as luminal stenosis >50%. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using measures from the conventional ECG, derived vectorcardiography, and singular value decomposition measures of waveform complexity. RESULTSOf included patients (n=171, 60% male, age 59{+/-}13 years), 37 (22%) had >50% stenosis in at least one coronary artery, with single, double, or triple vessel disease in 38%, 38%, and 24%, respectively. A four parameter A-ECG score to detect significant CAD had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% confidence interval] of 0.87 [0.78-0.94], sensitivity 89 [69-97]%, specificity 82 [68-94]%, positive predictive value 55 [43-78]%, negative predictive value 96 [92-99]%, positive likelihood ratio 4.6 [2.9-13.1] and inverse negative likelihood ratio 6.4 [2.9-27.2]. CONCLUSIONA-ECG can rule out significant CAD on CCT with a high negative predictive value and overall good diagnostic performance. This supports the use of A-ECG to screen patients in a chest pain clinic setting who would benefit from further testing or not.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.