Back

Machine learning approaches to predict 30-day mortality following percutaneous coronary intervention in an Australian population

Chowdhury, M. R. K.; Stub, D.; Karim, M. N.; Brennan, A.; Reid, C. M.; Nanayakkara, S.; Lefkovits, J.; Moni, M. A.; Islam, M. S.; Chew, D. P.; Dinh, D.; Billah, B.

2025-03-06 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.03.01.25323134 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPre-procedural risk prediction of 30-day all-cause mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) aids in clinical decision-making and benchmarking hospital performance. This study aimed to identify pre-procedural factors to predict the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality post-PCI using machine learning (ML) approaches. MethodsThe study analysed 93,055 consecutive PCI procedures. Boruta feature selection method was used to identify key predictive variables. Seven ML algorithms were employed for models development and validation. Model performance was assessed using standard metrics for validation dataset. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was used to explain leading predictive variables. ResultsAmong the seven ML algorithms, the Extreme Gradient Booster (XGB) had the better performance across most metrics, such as accuracy (86.7%), root mean square error (36.5%), specificity (82.5%), precision (54.0%), F1 score (52.7%), and Brier score (13.3%). The XGB model also demonstrated strong discriminatory power, achieving a receiver operating characteristics-area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 85.5% (95% CI: 83.5%-87.4%). The XGB model identified left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), acute coronary syndrome (ACS), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), age, and complex lesion as the five leading factors associated with 30-day mortality post-PCI. Other factors, in order, were cardiogenic shock, body mass index (BMI), intubated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), lesion location, mechanical ventricular support, gender, and peripheral vascular disease (PVD). ConclusionThe XGB algorithm was identified as the best predictive model for 30-day all-cause mortality post-PCI. It is essential to underscore the need for further validation of the model with external data to ensure its applicability to other populations. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPICO_LIrisk-adjustment model for an Australian percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patient population was previously developed to predict 30-day mortality post-PCI using traditional regression model. C_LIO_LIknowledge, patient characteristics, and clinical practices evolve over time, requiring frequent model updates to reflect new evidence, guidelines, and interventions C_LI WHAT THIS STUDY ADDSO_LIA machine learning (ML)-based preprocedural risk prediction model for 30-day mortality post-PCI was developed. The Extreme Gradient Booster (XGB) model was identified as the top performer in predicting 30-day all-cause mortality post-PCI. The model selected left ventricular ejection fraction, acute coronary syndrome, estimated glomerular filtration rate, age, and complex lesion as the top influential factors. C_LI HOW THIS STUDY MIGHT AFFECT RESEARCH, PRACTICE OR POLICYO_LIRisk prediction models aid clinical decision-making, enhance patient counselling, improve care quality, inform healthcare policies, and advance research. C_LI

Published in Open Heart (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
13.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.9%
3
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
7
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
10
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.5%
11
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
13
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
Open Heart · published here
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
15
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%