Improving the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in point-of-care settings: a real-world performance evaluation of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System
Bolanaki, M.; Möckel, M.; Dodoo, C.; Gilliam, K.; Robbins, E.; Hata, D. J.; White, B.
Show abstract
BackgroundThere is a need to confirm the clinical performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Cobas(R) SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS- CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals at POC settings. MethodsThis prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted. FindingsOverall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146). The OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively. InterpretationPOC SARS-CoV-2 used in real-world POC settings showed good overall clinical performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Key pointsO_LIThere are limited clinical studies evaluating the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 assays in real-world populations C_LIO_LIThe Cobas(R) SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System showed good clinical performance relative to a widely used laboratory-based test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 at two point-of-care hospital sites. C_LIO_LIEfficient point-of-care testing will help improve the timely management of SARS- CoV-2 infections C_LI
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 97%
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 97%
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection testing in symptomatic and asymptomatic children in the clinical setting 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A rapid, high-sensitivity SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid immunoassay to aid diagnosis of acute COVID-19 at the point of care 98%
- Multicenter evaluation of a fully automated high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 antigen immunoassay 96%
- Performance evaluation of the LumiraDx SARS-CoV-2 & Flu A/B Test in diagnosing COVID-19 and influenza in patients with respiratory symptoms 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic accuracy of two commercial SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-detecting rapid tests at the point of care in community-based testing centers 97%
- Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use of Abbott PanBio - A WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 97%
- Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Point of Care Devices in the Laboratory and Clinical Setting 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of the Cue COVID-19 Molecular Test for Point of Care: Insights from a multi-site clinic service model 96%
- Evaluation of the INDICAID™ COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Test in symptomatic populations and asymptomatic community testing 96%
- Clinical evaluation of BD Veritor™ SARS-CoV-2 and Flu A+B Assay for point-of-care (POC) System 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.