Back

Improving the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in point-of-care settings: a real-world performance evaluation of the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System

Bolanaki, M.; Möckel, M.; Dodoo, C.; Gilliam, K.; Robbins, E.; Hata, D. J.; White, B.

2025-03-04 infectious diseases
10.1101/2025.02.28.25323093 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThere is a need to confirm the clinical performance of point-of-care (POC) testing for severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in emergency departments and time-sensitive outpatient settings. This study aimed to compare the clinical performance of the Cobas(R) SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System (POC SARS- CoV-2) with the Cobas SARS-CoV-2 Qualitative Assay for use on the Cobas 6800/8800 System (68/8800) when used to detect SARS-CoV-2 infection in individuals at POC settings. MethodsThis prospective, two-site, non-interventional study, conducted in the US and Germany, collected fresh POC nasopharyngeal samples according to local procedures for upper respiratory swab sampling. Pairwise agreement was evaluated by estimating positive, negative, and overall percent agreement (PPA, NPA, and OPA, respectively) between POC SARS-CoV-2 and 68/8800 assays. Site-specific analyses were also conducted. FindingsOverall, 317 evaluable samples were collected from March 30 to July 2023 (US site) and from November 7, 2023 to April 4, 2024 (German site). Relative to 68/8800, POC SARS-CoV-2 had a PPA of 98.8% (169/171) and an NPA of 90.4% (132/146). The OPA was 95.0%. Site-specific analyses were broadly comparable to the overall results, although enrichment for positive samples at the US site resulted in a PPA and NPA of 98.6% (139/141) and 55.6% (5/9), respectively. InterpretationPOC SARS-CoV-2 used in real-world POC settings showed good overall clinical performance relative to 68/8800, a widely used and accurate laboratory-based test, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. Efficient POC testing will help improve the timely management of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Key pointsO_LIThere are limited clinical studies evaluating the clinical performance of SARS-CoV-2 assays in real-world populations C_LIO_LIThe Cobas(R) SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat System showed good clinical performance relative to a widely used laboratory-based test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 at two point-of-care hospital sites. C_LIO_LIEfficient point-of-care testing will help improve the timely management of SARS- CoV-2 infections C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.4%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.1%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
5
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
9
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.2%
11
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
13
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
15
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
24
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.9%
25
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical Pathology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%