Justice and fairness in research priority setting exercises on climate and health: a systematic review
Lake, S. J.; Bhaumik, S.
Show abstract
Research priority setting (RPS) exercises are a collective activity, involving various interest-holders to reach consensus on what research should be prioritised. It enables research being more relevant to interest holders. With climate change being visible there is increasing research on climate and health. Consequently, research priority setting on climate and health domain has also become more common. RPS exercises can serve to sustain or enhance various types of injustices, be it epistemic injustice, climate injustices or other forms of injustice and unfair knowledge practices. On the other hand, it can also serve as pro-justice, pro-fairness tool in the knowledge ecosystem of climate and health. To understand how RPS exercises on climate and health consider, and address justice and fairness by systematically reviewing them.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Health Effects of Climate Change: An Overview of Systematic Reviews 92%
- Impact of a sanitation intervention on quality of life and mental wellbeing in low-income urban neighbourhoods of Maputo, Mozambique 92%
- Participatory research in health intervention studies involving migrants: a systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health journal coverage of climate change and health: a bibliometric study 95%
- Public engagement and crowdfunding for health research: A global qualitative evidence synthesis and TDR pilot 92%
- The remaining unknowns: A mixed methods study of the current and global health research priorities for COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- How does policy modelling work in practice? A global analysis on the use of epidemiological modelling in health crises 91%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 91%
- The Humanitarian-Development Nexus and Sexual and Reproductive Health Interventions in Fragile Settings: A Scoping Review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 91%
- Short-term health system responses to epidemics across hard-to-reach areas in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review protocol 90%
- The health impacts of a 4-month long community-wide COVID-19 lockdown: Findings from a prospective longitudinal study in the state of Victoria, Australia 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Health equity impacts of climate change in the UK: a rapid systematic review and interactive evidence gap map 93%
- Land-use change from food to energy: meta-analysis unravels effects of bioenergy on biodiversity and amenity 87%
- Intersecting vulnerabilities: Climatic and demographic contributions to future population exposure to Aedes-borne viruses in the United States 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.