Back

The effect of a single session of tDCS on attention in pediatric acquired brain injury: Characterising inter-individual structural and functional network response variability

Stein, A.; Caulfield, K. A.; Singh, M.; Riddle, J.; Friehs, M. A.; Craven, M. P.; Groom, M. J.; Iyer, K. K.; Barlow, K. M.

2025-03-01 neurology
10.1101/2025.02.27.25323049 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 1 in 4 children who sustain an acquired brain injury (ABI) have attention difficulties impacting education, employment, and community participation. These difficulties arise from dysfunction in attention-related brain networks, incentivising the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Objective/HypothesisWe investigated whether a single tDCS session improved attention following childhood ABI and whether baseline structural connectivity (sc), functional connectivity (fc), attention, and/or simulated electric fields (E-field) explained variability in response. MethodsIn a randomised, single-blind, within-subject, sham-controlled trial, 15 children with ABI (mean 12.7 years) and 15 healthy controls (HCs) received three single tDCS sessions (1mA dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC], 1mA inferior frontal gyrus [IFG], sham; 20min) during gamified attention training. We examined post-intervention changes in attention according to flanker and stop signal reaction time (RT). We used multi-modal analyses (high-density electroencephalography [HD-EEG], diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance imaging) to investigate inter-individual variability in tDCS response, according to associations between RT change and baseline fc, sc, attention, and E-fields. ResultsAlthough no effect of active versus sham tDCS was found overall, participants with lower theta or higher gamma default mode network connectivity and poorer attention at baseline showed greater response to tDCS. Higher E-fields were associated with greater response. No serious adverse effects occurred. ConclusionsA single tDCS session targeting dlPFC or IFG did not improve attention following pediatric ABI. We demonstrated how HD-EEG source-based connectivity may be used to personalise tDCS. Future research should explore whether personalization, and/or repeated tDCS sessions can improve attention following pediatric ABI.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
18.4%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.0%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
4
Clinical Neurophysiology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
5
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
7
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
8
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
9
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
10
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
12
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Epilepsia
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Network Neuroscience
116 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
17
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
19
Journal of Neurotrauma
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
20
Brain Communications
147 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%