Back

The effect of a single session of tDCS on attention in pediatric acquired brain injury: Characterising inter-individual structural and functional network response variability

Stein, A.; Caulfield, K. A.; Singh, M.; Riddle, J.; Friehs, M. A.; Craven, M. P.; Groom, M. J.; Iyer, K. K.; Barlow, K. M.

2025-03-01 neurology
10.1101/2025.02.27.25323049
Show abstract

BackgroundApproximately 1 in 4 children who sustain an acquired brain injury (ABI) have attention difficulties impacting education, employment, and community participation. These difficulties arise from dysfunction in attention-related brain networks, incentivising the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Objective/HypothesisWe investigated whether a single tDCS session improved attention following childhood ABI and whether baseline structural connectivity (sc), functional connectivity (fc), attention, and/or simulated electric fields (E-field) explained variability in response. MethodsIn a randomised, single-blind, within-subject, sham-controlled trial, 15 children with ABI (mean 12.7 years) and 15 healthy controls (HCs) received three single tDCS sessions (1mA dorsolateral prefrontal cortex [dlPFC], 1mA inferior frontal gyrus [IFG], sham; 20min) during gamified attention training. We examined post-intervention changes in attention according to flanker and stop signal reaction time (RT). We used multi-modal analyses (high-density electroencephalography [HD-EEG], diffusion tensor imaging, magnetic resonance imaging) to investigate inter-individual variability in tDCS response, according to associations between RT change and baseline fc, sc, attention, and E-fields. ResultsAlthough no effect of active versus sham tDCS was found overall, participants with lower theta or higher gamma default mode network connectivity and poorer attention at baseline showed greater response to tDCS. Higher E-fields were associated with greater response. No serious adverse effects occurred. ConclusionsA single tDCS session targeting dlPFC or IFG did not improve attention following pediatric ABI. We demonstrated how HD-EEG source-based connectivity may be used to personalise tDCS. Future research should explore whether personalization, and/or repeated tDCS sessions can improve attention following pediatric ABI.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
NeuroImage: Clinical
based on 77 papers
Top 0.5%
13.1%
2
Human Brain Mapping
based on 53 papers
Top 0.5%
11.3%
3
Brain Stimulation
based on 27 papers
Top 0.2%
11.2%
4
Clinical Neurophysiology
based on 19 papers
Top 0.3%
7.6%
5
Brain Communications
based on 79 papers
Top 2%
5.4%
6
NeuroImage
based on 36 papers
Top 0.9%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 51%
3.0%
8
Cortex
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 5%
2.8%
10
Journal of Neurotrauma
based on 11 papers
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
based on 29 papers
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Journal of Neural Engineering
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
13
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 5%
1.6%
14
Epilepsia
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
15
Brain and Behavior
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 92%
1.3%
17
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Brain
based on 69 papers
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
based on 10 papers
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
21
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 4%
0.7%