Back

Middle Managers as Barriers or Enablers in Tackling Racial Discrimination in the NHS: A Qualitative Research Study

Long, J.; Buchan, S.; Sampson, F. C.; Otaye-Ebede, L.; Dawson, J.

2025-03-01 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.02.27.25323018 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo explore the role of senior and mid-level managers as barriers or enablers to change in tackling the discriminatory challenges experienced by Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) employees working in the NHS. DesignA multi-level, multi-sourced qualitative study of five NHS Trusts in England. Setting and participants26 qualitative interviews with senior leaders and BME network chairs (27 participants) and 5 focus groups (37 participants) with BME employees, across five NHS Trusts in England. ResultsOur findings revealed that discrimination, racial harassment, incivilities, lack of progression and exclusion experienced by BME employees, appear to be deeply ingrained in the culture of the NHS. Despite numerous national and local initiatives aimed to promote inclusivity and address discriminatory behaviours, our findings also revealed a notable disparity between what senior leaders thought was effective in addressing discriminatory behaviours and the actual lived experiences of BME employees. Finally, a key finding was the pivotal role middle managers played in setting the tone for whether discriminatory behaviours are challenged or allowed to persist, which directly impacts on the overall experiences of BME employees within the NHS. ConclusionsOur results provide evidence that not only does racial discrimination continue to be experienced by NHS BME employees, but that middle managers are key to addressing and improving this situation. Despite there being national policies and initiatives addressing racial discrimination, our study found that positive change, whether at an individual or organisational level, is dependent on the actions and commitment of middle managers. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONSO_LIMulti-sourced data from both senior leaders and BME staff C_LIO_LIBME staff in a variety of roles and grades C_LIO_LIMixed qualitative method using interviews and focus groups C_LIO_LISelf-selected focus group participants may not be representative C_LIO_LIParticipating Trusts actively motivated to address issues re: inequality - again less representative C_LI

Published in BMJ Open (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.