Accessibility and perceived quality of GP care for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients: a qualitative patient-centered interview study
Bijl, H. A.; Zwinkels, D. N.; van Linschoten, R. C. A.
Show abstract
IntroductionPatients with lower socioeconomic status (SES) in the Netherlands may face significant barriers to accessing and receiving general practitioner (GP) care. Factors such as lower health literacy, economic disadvantage, and cultural diversity contribute to these challenges, often leading to lower satisfaction and reduced access. This study investigates how patients with low SES perceive the accessibility and quality of GP care, with the goal of identifying ways to improve care for this vulnerable group. MethodsThis qualitative study used in-depth semi-structured interviews to explore how patients with low SES experience the accessibility and perceived quality of GP care. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. ResultsA total of 16 patients were interviewed. Key themes emerged regarding accessibility and perceived quality of care. Patients highly valued quick access to appointments and multiple contact options. Digital healthcare tools were appreciated for their convenience, especially among younger and more educated patients. However, face-to-face interactions were universally preferred for serious health concerns. Effective communication and empathic care turned out to be crucial factors in shaping patient satisfaction. Lastly, the importance of continuity of care was emphasized, especially by patients with chronic conditions, who valued building strong rapports with their GP. ConclusionOur study found that quick access, multiple contact options, and clear communication are key drivers of patient satisfaction with GP care for patients with low SES. Emphasizing communication quality and empathetic care can significantly improve the perceived quality and accessibility of healthcare for vulnerable populations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 96%
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 95%
- Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants’ Access to Primary Care: A National Qualitative Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 96%
- COVI-Prim survey: Challenges for Austrian and German general practitioners during initial phase of COVID-19 96%
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Physician experiences of electronic health records interoperability and its practical impact on care delivery in the English NHS: A cross-sectional survey study 95%
- Pre-Post Analysis of the Impact of British Columbia Nurse Practitioner Primary Care Clinics on Patient Health and Care Experience 95%
- What is the suitability of clinical vignettes in benchmarking the performance of online symptom checkers? An audit study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 95%
- Patients’ and carers’ experiences of, and engagement with remote home monitoring services for COVID-19 patients: a rapid mixed-methods study 95%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.