Status and Opportunities of Machine Learning Applications in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Narrative Review
Lima Diniz Araujo, M.; Winger, T.; Ghosn, S.; Saab, C.; Srivastava, J.; Kazaglis, L.; Mathur, P.; Mehra, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent and potentially severe sleep disorder characterized by repeated interruptions in breathing during sleep. Machine learning models have been increasingly applied in various aspects of OSA research, including diagnosis, treatment optimization, and developing biomarkers for endotypes and disease mechanisms. ObjectiveThis narrative review evaluates the application of machine learning in OSA research, focusing on model performance, dataset characteristics, demographic representation, and validation strategies. We aim to identify trends and gaps to guide future research and improve clinical decision-making that leverages machine learning. MethodsThis narrative review examines data extracted from 254 scientific publications published in the PubMed database between January 2018 and March 2023. Studies were categorized by machine learning applications, models, tasks, validation metrics, data sources, and demographics. ResultsOur analysis revealed that most machine learning applications focused on OSA classification and diagnosis, utilizing various data sources such as polysomnography, electrocardiogram data, and wearable devices. We also found that study cohorts were predominantly overweight males, with an underrepresentation of women, younger obese adults, individuals over 60 years old, and diverse racial groups. Many studies had small sample sizes and limited use of robust model validation. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the need for more inclusive research approaches, starting with adequate data collection in terms of sample size and bias mitigation for better generalizability of machine learning models in OSA research. Addressing these demographic gaps and methodological opportunities is critical for ensuring more robust and equitable applications of artificial intelligence in healthcare.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Image Transcription for Perinatal Blood Pressure Monitoring Using Mobile Health Technology 91%
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 90%
- Longitudinally Tracking Personal Physiomes for Precision Management of Childhood Epilepsy 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Is sleep apnea-hypopnea index relevant for impaired brain perfusion and desaturation in patients with severe obstructive sleep apnea syndromes? 95%
- Novel Digital Markers of Sleep Dynamics: A Causal Inference Approach Revealing Age and Gender Phenotypes in Obstructive Sleep Apnea 93%
- Transformers for rapid detection of airway stenosis and stridor 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a Machine Learning Approach Utilizing Wearable Data for Prediction of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers 91%
- A Machine Learning Approach to Identifying Delirium from Electronic Health Records 88%
- Characterizing subgroup performance of probabilistic phenotype algorithms within older adults: A case study for dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Extraction of Sleep Information from Clinical Notes of Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease Using Natural Language Processing 94%
- Use of unstructured text in prognostic clinical prediction models: a systematic review 89%
- Machine Learning Approaches for Electronic Health Records Phenotyping: A Methodical Review 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.