Back

"The injection gives freedom" - An exploration of long-acting injectable HIV treatment acceptance among patients seeking care in two Nairobi tertiary hospitals

Nyukuri, D.; Shah, R. C.; Mbithi, A.; Abongo, M.; Kundu, C.; Mutai, K.

2025-02-28 hiv aids
10.1101/2025.02.26.25322923 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundLong-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy offers an alternative to daily oral HIV treatment, potentially improving adherence and reducing stigma. While its adoption has been successful in some settings, evidence on its acceptability in sub-Saharan Africa, outside clinical trials, remains limited. MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods study among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in two tertiary hospitals in Nairobi, Kenya--a public facility (Kenyatta National Hospital) and a private facility (Aga Khan University Hospital). A cross-sectional survey of 356 participants assessed awareness, willingness to switch, and predictors of acceptability. In addition, 30 participants took part in three focus group discussions (FGDs) exploring perceptions, concerns, and system-level considerations. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, while qualitative data were analyzed thematically. ResultsOverall, 72.2% of survey participants indicated willingness to switch to LAI-ART. Prior awareness of LAI-ART was the strongest independent predictor of acceptability (aOR 4.03, 95% CI: (1.45-11.18). Drivers of interest included reducing pill burden (77.8%), improving adherence (55.6%), and maintaining privacy (45.5%). Despite high acceptability, FGDs revealed cautious optimism, with concerns about side effects, treatment rigidity, and logistical challenges such as travel and clinic access. ConclusionThese findings suggest that while LAI-ART is seen as promising, its uptake will depend on education, trust-building, and reliable delivery systems. Successful introduction in Kenya will require patient-centered communication, system readiness, and equitable access strategies.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.1%
2
Journal of the International AIDS Society
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
4
AIDS and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
7
AIDS
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
Tropical Medicine & International Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
25
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Sexually Transmitted Infections
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%