Back

Executive Functions in relation to Autonomic Control: An Overview of Neuropsychological Evaluation Methods

Shah, S.; Kuber, J.; Lewis, G. F.

2025-02-26 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.02.25.640212 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Executive functions are a set of cognitive processes essential for cognitive control and coordination, enabling the achievement of objectives. These functions include mental exploration of ideas, reasoning, logical conclusion drawing, discipline, decision making, thoughtful consideration before action, tackling unforeseen challenges, resisting temptations, and maintaining focus. Numerous neuropsychological tests assess executive functions in relation to different autonomic control pathways that regulate involuntary physiological processes. The complexity of the autonomic nervous system and the challenges in measuring it alongside cognitive assessments are significant. Issues such as subject movement, environmental changes, and time-consuming protocols further complicate this measurement. There is a notable lack of research on suitable neuropsychological tests for assessing executive functions across diverse autonomic regulatory states. This paper reviews the most frequently used neuropsychological instruments in this context, aiming to guide the research community towards optimal tasks and administration protocols for concurrent autonomic nervous system measurement. The diversity of current executive function tests presents both opportunities and challenges. Some tests are better suited for simultaneous neurophysiological measurements due to their design, duration, and cognitive load, while others may interfere with or be influenced by such monitoring. This variability can lead to inconsistencies in findings and complicate result interpretation and comparison across studies of brain disorders. A significant drawback of using different tasks is the difficulty in comparing outcomes and conducting meta-analyses. Standardizing a smaller selection of tasks with consistent protocols would enhance research reliability, facilitate robust comparisons, and improve the overall quality of meta-analyses. To achieve this standardization, it is essential to first survey and describe the current landscape of executive function assessments in conjunction with autonomic nervous system measurements. ObjectiveThis paper aims to comprehensively analyze current instruments utilized in the assessment of executive functions, elucidating their advantages, limitations, and implications for future standardization initiatives. By systematically examining the most prevalent tools for evaluating executive functions in conjunction with autonomic nervous system measurements within clinical and experimental research settings, this review seeks to provide valuable insights for enhancing methodological consistency and advancing research in this area. MethodsWe searched for articles published using the PubMed database with the following terms: (neuropsychological test OR neuropsychological evaluation OR neuropsychological measure*) AND (executive functions OR EF OR executive function) AND (autonomic OR ANS OR parasympathetic OR PNS OR vagal OR "heart rate variability" OR HRV OR sympathetic OR HPA OR electrodermal OR RSA) Only the healthy population was chosen. There was no language restriction. Results62 articles fulfilled all the inclusion criteria. The 5 neuropsychological tests most frequently used to evaluate executive functions in relation to autonomic regulation were: O_LITrail Making Test (TMT) B C_LIO_LIThe n-back Task including 2-back Task C_LIO_LIWisconsin Card Sorting Test C_LIO_LIStroop Test and its variants C_LIO_LIWechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)-Working Memory Composite C_LI The domains of executive functions most frequently assessed are: cognitive flexibility, working memory, and inhibitory control/selective attention. ConclusionThese findings offer valuable insights for future research directions and the development of standardized assessment protocols for executive functions, tailored to diverse socio-demographic profiles.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
2
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
5
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
7
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
8
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
10
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.9%
11
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.9%
12
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
13
International Journal of Psychophysiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
18
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
21
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
23
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
24
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
28
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
29
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%