Back

Contribution of Rare Large High-Penetrance CNVs to Pediatric and MODY Diabetes in Norway

Artaza, H.; Priyanka, D.; Molnes, J.; Lavrichenko, K.; Wolff, A. S. B.; Royrvik, E. C.; Skrivarhaug, T.; Vaudel, M.; Bratland, E.; Johansson, B.; Njolstad, P. R.; Johansson, S.

2025-02-28 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2025.02.25.25322584 medRxiv
Show abstract

Technological advancements have significantly improved our understanding of Copy Number Variants (CNVs) and their role in disease. However, detecting CNVs in clinical diagnostics remains challenging, and important pathogenic CNVs may go undetected. This study systematically assessed the impact of rare, large, high-penetrance CNVs on pediatric diabetes and Maturity-onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY) in Norway. We analyzed data from the nationwide Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry (NCDR) covering 2002-2018 and the Norwegian MODY Registry (NMR) from 1997-2019. CNV detection was performed using the Illumina Infinium Global Screen Array-24 v2.0 on a total of 5,889 individuals and we compared the results to diagnostic records. Our findings indicate that 0.63% of the patients in the Norwegian MODY Registry and 0.09% in the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry are attributable to established pathogenic large copy number deletions detectable by array genotyping. Notably, six of the 14 pathogenic deletions identified (in the HNF1B [n=3], HNF1A [n=2], or GATA4 genes [n=1]) had not been detected through standard diagnostic methods in the routine diagnostic screening. For these individuals, accurate molecular diagnoses have significant implications for personalized treatment and follow-up. We found no evidence suggesting a major role for additional rare CNVs beyond the already established pathogenic CNVs in MODY. In conclusion, while pathogenic CNVs are rare, they remain relevant for patients of the Norwegian nationwide diabetes registries. Expanding screening for MODY variants, specifically 17q12-HNF1B and HNF1A deletions, to a larger portion of the pediatric diabetes population should be considered.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Genomic Medicine
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
Human Mutation
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.3%
4
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Human Molecular Genetics
130 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
Journal of Medical Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
9
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
12
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
The American Journal of Human Genetics
206 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
15
Genetic Epidemiology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
17
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Genetics in Medicine
69 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
Human Genetics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
23
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
24
BMC Medical Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
25
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
27
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
28
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
30
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%