Back

Understanding bottlenecks in the microbial production of partially acetylated chitooligosaccharides

Snoeck, S.; Malik, H.; Demeester, W.; Duchi, D.; Lips, W.; Guidi, C.; De Mey, M.

2025-02-24 synthetic biology
10.1101/2025.02.24.639843 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Chitooligosaccharides (COS) are versatile biomolecules with applications across food, pharmaceutical, and cosmetic industries. Expanding the COS portfolio, particularly with partially acetylated COS (paCOS) of defined degree and pattern of acetylation, is essential to unlocking their full potential. This study investigates the co-expression of chitin deacetylases (CDAs) with a chitooligosaccharide synthase (CHS) RhNodC in E. coli for in vivo paCOS production. While this approach shows promise, it is hampered by reduced overall (pa)COS yields and incomplete conversion of fully acetylated COS to paCOS. Our findings reveal that RhNodC and CDAs co-localize, suggesting potential interactions that influence production efficiency. Additionally, CDA expression induces significant stress responses, including upregulation of ibpA and cpxP promoters linked to inclusion body formation and membrane stress, respectively. This is accompanied by pronounced cellular elongation, further indicating cellular distress. These bottlenecks highlight the need for deeper exploration of RhNodC-CDA interactions and stress mitigation strategies to optimize scalable in vivo paCOS production. Highlights- Co-expression of rhizobial NodC and chitin deacetylases reduces chitooligosaccharide yield. - Conversion of COS into paCOS remains incomplete upon co-expression. - Upregulation of stress responses suggests protein misfolding and membrane stress. - NodC and chitin deacetylases possibly co-localize and affect cellular localization. - Chitin deacetylase expression causes cell elongation up to 30 micrometers. - Further study needed on rhizobial NodC-chitin deacetylase and substrate interactions.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.