Foundation time series models for forecasting and policy evaluation in infectious disease epidemics
Kalahasti, S.; Faucher, B.; Wang, B.; Ascione, C.; Carbajal, R.; Enault, M.; Cassis, C. V.; Launay, T.; Guerrisi, C.; Boelle, P.-Y.; Baldo, F.; Valdano, E.
Show abstract
Epidemic forecasting and policy evaluation rely on mathematical models to predict infectious disease trends and assess the impact of public health policies. Traditional models typically require extensive epidemiological data and may struggle in data-limited settings. Transformer-based, foundation AI models have demonstrated strong predictive capabilities in various time series applications. We investigated whether they can be the basis of a new epidemic modeling framework. We evaluated five foundation models - TabPFN-TS, TimeGPT, TimesFM, Lag-Llama, and Chronos - across diverse pathogens, diseases and locations, including influenza-like illness, RSV, chickenpox, dengue, COVID-19 and neonatal bronchiolitis. Models were tested for long-term forecasting (multi-season predictions), short-term forecasting (four-week-ahead predictions), and epidemic peak timing estimation. We also assessed their ability to generate counterfactual scenarios in policy evaluation, using COVID-19 restriction measures in Italy, RSV immunization in France, and synthetic epidemic data as validation. Foundation models demonstrated strong predictive accuracy, possibly outperforming traditional statistical and mechanistic models in data-limited contexts. They generated multi-season forecasts and short-term forecasts with good accuracy and stable uncertainty. They gave reliable peak timing estimates months before the actual peak. In policy evaluation, TabPFN-TS accurately estimated intervention effects, matching estimates from an independent epidemiological study. Our findings suggest that foundation models can complement existing approaches in epidemic modeling. Their ability to generate accurate forecasts and counterfactual analyses with minimal data input highlights their potential for real-time public health decision-making, particularly in emergent and resource-constrained settings. Further research should explore domain-specific adaptations to optimize performance for infectious disease modeling.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Adherence and sustainability of interventions informing optimal control against COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- COVID-19 in Italy: targeted testing as a proxy of limited health care facilities and a key to reducing hospitalization rate and the death toll 94%
- Forecasting hospital-level COVID-19 admissions using real-time mobility data 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Intensive Care Unit Resource Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 95%
- SimpactCyan 1.0: An Open-source Simulator for Individual-Based Models in HIV Epidemiology with R and Python Interfaces 94%
- Forecasting virus outbreaks with social media data via neural ordinary differential equations 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.